Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 Senate Bill 26: Authorize government subsidy for Grayling amusement park

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Just what we need a bunch more government paid directors, NOT!  by Anonymous Citizen on June 30, 2007 
This reads a lot like the Detroit "Downtown Development Authority", create an orginization to collect more taxes, when the real problem tourism is down is because our state taxes are to high. Drop the sales tax back down and drop the gas taxes down, then you would see people flocking to this state. The higher taxes have driven not only the tourism away but now the businesses too.
Reply

Line

2) This is why local control  by plumberboy on June 4, 2007 
This is why local control is the way to go then Grayling would decicde if the tax revenue should go to the park in a loan or to the items it normally pays for in their community. The thing is it will create about 2,000 jobs which I am sure a smaller town like Grayling needs.The problem is state tax money that is normally sent into the community will be used for this so in my opinion the local folks should get to vote on this not some fat cat in Lansing and if the system ran like it should be run all the loaned money would come from local taxpayers out of their funds the state wouldn't even be involved but because state government bleeds us for every tax dime it can their is very little left for local government we need to get rid of a lot of the state government and get back to local people running their communities and in control of their tax revenue.
Reply

Line

3) maybe the government  by Anonymous Citizen on June 4, 2007 
should CUT TAXES and REDUCE THE REGULATORY LOAD, and see if THAT brings in new business and prosperity.

it worked for the other states, let's try it here.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation