Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 Senate Bill 25: Mandate employer, school, medical and financial service deaf-blind interpreters

Public Act 23 of 2007

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Is this how  by Anonymous Citizen on April 19, 2007 
Our legislators are going to reduce employment in this state, by forcing "potential" employers to hire interpretors? Will this bill help the blind and deaf find meaningful employment if the employer has to hire two people instead of one? The bill only provides another handcap/challenge to the the blind and/or deaf and that they will have to overcome. Are the blind and deaf business people required to hire interpretors, or are they capable of running their own businesses without them?

Can the "interpretor" be assigned other tasks and do the blind and deaf in the organization make the interpretor "fire proof"?

This is undoubtedly one of the most stupid bills I have seen come from this legislature. Maybe the public needs to hire someone to provide some sense for our leislators.
Reply

Line

2) 2007 Senate Bill 25 (Mandate employer, school, medical and financial service deaf-blind interpreters )  by admin on January 1, 2001 
Introduced in the Senate on January 24, 2007, to explicitly place in Michigan law the same requirement imposed by the Americans with Disabilities Act that a potential private employer, health care facility, educational institution, or financial institution must hire a "qualified interpreter" for the deaf or blind in any employment, medical, educational or financial situation involving a deaf or blind person, and also establish that a "qualified interpretor" is only one who has been certified by through the National Registry of Interpreters for the Deaf or another national organization recognized by state authorities. The bill would also authorize criminal penalties for a person posing as a qualified interpreter without the necessary credentials or government approval

The vote was 37 in favor, 0 opposed and 1 not voting

(Senate Roll Call 138 at Senate Journal 48)

Click here to view bill details.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation