Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 Senate Bill 159: Mandate maximum K-3 class size

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Re: Idea  by Anonymous Citizen on April 23, 2007 
Sorry you're facing layoff but the schools do not exist just to give you a job. Nor is it reasonable to expect other teachers to give up their hard earned wages or benefits to ensure that you have a job. This bill is bad policy because the money just isn't there to pay for it. Perhaps in a better financial climate it would be possible but not now.
Reply

Line

2) MEA won't change retirement or benefits  by Anonymous Citizen on February 8, 2007 
What state are you living in when you think the MEA would sacrifice any portion of retirement or benefits to allow districts to decrease layoffs? It's not the state of Michigan. Must be the state of denial!
Reply

Line

3) Where do we find the classrooms?  by Anonymous Citizen on February 8, 2007 
I agree with this post. Where do we find the additional money and space? We have one school in our district that would meet these requirements, and they don't have any empty classrooms. Under this proposal, with their limited funds and no additional space, they would have to add 3 classrooms, 3 teachers, and all the accompanying supplies. Realistically, these students would be better off keeping 24 kids in a classroom and spending the extra money to buy clean, warm clothes and food to send home. A smaller classroom doesn't help much when the kids only eat half of their lunch so they can take the rest home for supper.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation