Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 Senate Bill 158: Revise child abuse definitions

Public Act 577 of 2008

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Re: 2007 Senate Bill 158 (Revise child abuse definitions )  by Admin003 on December 27, 2008 

 


Rep. Sheen, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:


“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:


I agree with the intent of this bill, but the defintion od “serious mental harm” is so subjective that almost anything could be considered serious mental harm. The definition must be tightened up and more objective, otherwise it create more problems than it helps.”


Reply

Line

2) Re: 2007 Senate Bill 158 (Revise child abuse definitions )  by Admin003 on December 27, 2008 

 


Rep. Agema, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:


“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:


This opens up Pandora’s box and takes away parental rights. Already we have CPS taking kids away from parents for spanking- what’s next.”


Reply

Line

3) Re: 2007 Senate Bill 158 (Revise child abuse definitions )  by Admin003 on December 27, 2008 

 


Rep. Caswell, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:


“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:


This bill is well intentioned. However, it is too broad and will have unseen consequences. There are particular abuse problems this bill is attempting to address and the bill should be written to take care of just those problems and not be so broad.”


Reply

Line


View Full Conversation