Introduced by Rep. Richard Hammel (D) on September 20, 2007, to give the Department of Labor and Economic Growth the authority to increase without additional legislative authorization certain limited liability company filing fees.
Referred to the House Appropriations Committee on September 20, 2007.
Reported in the House on September 25, 2007, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on September 25, 2007, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that does not give the Department Of Labor And Economic Growth the authority to increase the fee without additional legislative authorization. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on September 25, 2007.
Passed 91 to 18 in the House on September 25, 2007, to not reduce certain limited liability company filing fees on Sept. 30, 2007. The fees were “temporarily” increased by a previous legislature, and under current law will go back down after that date. The bill would extend the higher fees until September 30, 2012. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on September 26, 2007.
Referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee on September 26, 2007.
Reported in the Senate on September 28, 2007, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed 35 to 3 in the Senate on September 30, 2007, to not reduce certain limited liability company filing fees on Sept. 30, 2007. The fees were “temporarily” increased by a previous legislature, and under current law will go back down after that date. The bill would extend the higher fees until September 30, 2012. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on September 30, 2007.
1) not just GROANholm by Anonymous Citizen on October 2, 2007 Look at the vote - 100% of the DumboCRATS and 60% of the REPrehensibles voted for what she wanted - to suck Michiganders dry. Almost all of them have gone to the dark side, to kill the fruits of the labor of hardworking Michiganders.
Did you put blood, sweat and tears into your business? Too bad, so sad, GROANholm and her evil minions are glad. Reply
2) Moving your business to another state? by Anonymous Citizen on October 2, 2007 Yes we all want to move our businesses to another state while Granholm is still in the governor's office, but she knows she has some of us by the short hairs. If we have any kind of money tied up in real estate here, we can't unload it for anything like what it should be valued for, not to mention our property values on our homes and those of employees who would also be forced to sell at a loss because no one wants to move to Michigan while the brainless blonde twit is still in Lansing. Hmmmm I feel a blonde joke coming on, but I can't laugh through my tears of watching all we have worked for slowly going down the drain the last 5 years. Guess the joke is on Michigan citizens. Reply
3) That's right. Continue to kill the economy with more taxes by Anonymous Citizen on October 1, 2007 You legislatures really need to pack it up. You know so little about "GROWING THE ECONOMY." Any one with half a brain knows that it makes more sense to entice business, with incentives, to stay or move to Michigan, than to constantly dip your hands into the few pockets left in this state. In case you're that stupid: Incentives are what you offer people to encourage a desired action-- not what you take away from people. Get the "CLUB" out of your hands you archaic bunch of cavemen because you can't get blood from a stone.
And one other important point: There are 49 other states with the potentional to entice my business to move and they're not all taxing their citizens to death.
It's time you legislatures make the same sacrifices your Constituents have made by being downsized.