Introduced by Rep. Steve Tobocman (D) on September 7, 2007, to “clean up” the income tax statutory language related to various tax deductions that went into effect in the past, with makes no substantive change in the law. The bill was later made the "vehicle" for an income tax hike (see final House- and Senate-passed versions).
Referred to the House Tax Policy Committee on September 7, 2007, and discharged from further consideration by the committee and directly to House floor on Sept. 14.
Substitute offered by Rep. Steve Tobocman (D) on September 14, 2007, to increase the state income tax to 4.6 percent, which would fall to 3.9 percent if the legislature passes and the people approved House Joint Resolution X, which would repeal the current prohibition on a graduated income tax in Michigan. The substitute passed in the House by voice vote on September 14, 2007.
Substitute offered by Rep. Steve Tobocman (D) on September 18, 2007, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that does not contain a tax hike, but instead just authorizes a $250 income tax exemption for disabled veterans. The substitute passed in the House by voice vote on September 18, 2007.
Passed in the House (77 to 26) on September 18, 2007, to authorize a $250 income tax exemption for disabled veterans. The bill was passed and sent to the Senate as a "vehicle" for a possible income tax hike, but without any actual rate increase included. This was done because bills must "lay over" in the other body for at least five days before being voted on, and if a tax increase is to be approved by Oct. 1 it is necessary to have a "vehicle" bill that has done so. [Vote Details and Comments]
Received in the Senate on September 19, 2007.
Referred to the Senate on September 19, 2007.
Substitute offered in the Senate on September 23, 2007, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that removes the income tax rate increase, removes the "tie bar" to a possible new service tax, and tie-bars the bill to a number of government financial reforms, including school employee health insurance and pension changes, Medicaid and welfare reforms, and more. (Here is the complete list of reform bills: SB 1, SB 395, SB 396, SB 397, SB 398, SB 418, SB 419, SB 420, SB 421, SB 546, SB 547, SB 549, SB 622, SB 632, SB 772, SB 773, SB 790, SB 791, SB 792, SB 793 and HB 4246, HB 4266, HB 4799 and HB 4800). The substitute passed in the Senate (21 to 17) on September 23, 2007. [Vote Details and Comments]
Amendment offered by Sen. Michael Switalski (D) on September 23, 2007, to tie-bar the bill to House Bill 5198, meaning this bill cannot become law unless that one does also. HB 5198 is a "vehicle" bill for a possible tax on some services. The amendment failed in the Senate (18 to 20) on September 23, 2007. [Vote Details and Comments]
Passed in the Senate (21 to 17) on September 23, 2007, to adopt a version of the bill that does not contain an income tax rate increase, does not contain a "tie bar" to a possible new service tax, but is tie-barred to a number of government financial reforms and policy changes, including school employee health insurance and pension changes, Medicaid and welfare reforms, privatizing some prison support services, and more (see Senate substitute for full list.) This and the passage of Senate Bills 237 and 511 establish the terms of negotiations between the House and Senate on taxes and spending . [Vote Details and Comments]
Received in the House on September 23, 2007, to concur with a Senate-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences. Failed in the House (0 to 108) on September 23, 2007. [Vote Details and Comments]
Received in the Senate on September 24, 2007.
Passed in the Senate (19 to 19) on October 1, 2007, to increase the state income tax from 3.9 percent to 4.35 percent, effective Oct. 1, 2007. The bill will take an additional $765 million, and is part of a deal to avoid state spending cuts that includes a $750 million service tax (House Bill 5198, later replaced by a 21.99 percent Michigan Business Tax surcharge), plus modest school employee pension reform (Senate Bills 546 and 547), a bill to make it easier for school districts to seek competitive bids on employee health insurance (Senate Bill 418), legislation limiting “double dipping” by retired school employees (House Bill 4800)
and a repeal a prohibition on contracting out mental health services in state prisons (Senate Bill 622). Note: the Lieutenant Governor (Democrat John Cherry) presides over the Senate and cast the 20th and deciding vote. [Vote Details and Comments]
Received in the House on September 25, 2007.
Passed in the House (57 to 52) on September 30, 2007, to increase the state income tax from 3.9 percent to 4.35 percent, effective Oct. 1, 2007. The bill will take an additional $765 million, and is part of a deal to avoid state spending cuts that includes a $750 million service tax (House Bill 5198, later replaced by a 21.99 percent Michigan Business Tax surcharge), plus modest school employee pension reform (Senate Bills 546 and 547), a bill to make it easier for school districts to seek competitive bids on employee health insurance (Senate Bill 418), legislation limiting “double dipping” by retired school employees (House Bill 4800)
and a repeal a prohibition on contracting out mental health services in state prisons (Senate Bill 622). [Vote Details and Comments]
Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on October 1, 2007.
1) Are they all idiots in Lansing? [by inform4 on October 1, 2008] Increase income tax from 3.9 percent to 4.35 percent? What is wrong with our Lansing representatives and their ability to do congnitive thinking? Raising the income tax will only give Lansing more money to porkbarrel away.
Don't they understand that Michigan is in a recession? Taxing their constituents at a time when we have numerous job and benefit losses as well as numerous homesteads in forclosures is ludicrous beyond measure. Reply
2) Response [by Anonymous Citizen on July 15, 2008] Lawmakers should have taken a closer look at
State Rep Ken Horn's "two penny plan" which
would have reduced state spending.
Shame on Andy Coulouris of the 95th and
Lee Gonzales of the 49th for voting to take
more money away from working class families
just to keep big goverment in Lansing.
I noticed Mr. Coulouris has yet to introduce
legislation that would end lifetime health care
for himself and other lawmakers. They took NO
personal sacrifice in this budget. They balanced it on the backs of the Michigan taxpayer.
Is this what we get for the second highest paid legislature in the nation? Reply
3) Response [by Anonymous Citizen on July 15, 2008] Lawmakers should have taken a closer look at
State Rep Ken Horn's "two penny plan" which
would have reduced state spending.
Shame on Andy Coulouris of the 95th and
Lee Gonzales of the 49th for voting to take
more money away from working class families
just to keep big goverment in Lansing.
I noticed Mr. Coulouris has yet to introduce
legislation that would end lifetime health care
for himself and other lawmakers. They took NO
personal sacrifice in this budget. They balanced it on the backs of the Michigan taxpayer.
Is this what we get for the second highest paid legislature in the nation? Reply