Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 House Bill 5147 (Require returnable beverage container bar codes and related equipment )

Public Act 387 of 2008

[Comments on this legislation] [Post new comment] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

Most Recent Comments

1) Re: 2007 House Bill 5147 (Require returnable beverage container bar codes and related equipment ) [by Admin003 on December 27, 2008]

 


Rep. Caswell, having reserved the right to explain his nay vote, made the following statement:


“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:


While I agree with the intent of the bill and I understand it supposedly protects retailers from the costs of retrofitting their machines, I believe that with the budget problems the State has that in another year the retailers will get stuck with the bill for retrofitting their machines. Thus I voted no.”


Reply

Line

2) Re: 2007 House Bill 5147 (Require returnable beverage container bar codes and related equipment ) [by Admin003 on December 14, 2008]

 


Senator Pappageorge, under his constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against the passage of Senate Bill No. 1648 and House Bill No. 5147.


Senator Pappageorge’s statement is as follows:


I want my colleagues to know that I am fully in support of this package of bills. The purpose of the “no” vote explanation is to remind folks that when we are done with these seven bills, this is just the beginning. We created two rows of counties where there will be difficulty turning in purported 10-cent cans. That doesn’t mean that it is a wall. Those truckloads of cans that have been coming into Michigan will continue to do so, and those trucks aren’t going to turn around. What they will do instead is they will drive another 45 minutes or so to the next county: Allegan, Barry, Eaton, Ingham, Livingston, Oakland, and Macomb. Particularly, in my district which straddles I-75, a whole bunch of trucks will be coming into Oakland County. This is a good first step, but we need to make sure that all of Michigan, all the storeowners in Michigan, are properly protected from fraud. Again, I applaud the sponsors of these seven bills, but I remind all of you that we are not done.


Reply

Line

3) Re: 2007 House Bill 5147 (Require returnable beverage container bar codes and related equipment ) [by Admin003 on December 8, 2008]

 


Rep. Caswell, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:


“Mr. Speaker and members of the House:


This bill and the others are more complicated than necessary. The problem could be addressed in a much simpler way.”


Reply

Line


View Full Conversation