Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 House Bill 5098 (Limit injury coverage for helmetless motorcycle riders )

[Comments on this legislation] [Post new comment] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

Most Recent Comments

1) Ass-uming [by Rabidog on August 26, 2007]
Your statement makes it sound as though you have information showing that there will be larger medical expenses incurred. Do you know this to be fact, or are you assuming it is fact due to the propaganda? Do you have studies showing how insurance payout would change as a result of repealing a helmet law? If not simply emotional, what are your sources?

Reply

Line

2) you weren't eligible for [by Anonymous Citizen on August 19, 2007]
coverage BEFORE, what makes you think you would be covered now?

you are just out of luck.
Reply

Line

3) 5098 [by Anonymous Citizen on August 19, 2007]
Does this mean if I am on a moped [no helmet required or insurance] and get wacked by a soccer mom on her cell phone that I not eligble for medical coverage?
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation