Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 House Bill 4884 (Revise tobacco lawsuit money distribution )

Public Act 50 of 2007

[Comments on this legislation] [Post new comment] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

Most Recent Comments

1) cancer [by Anonymous Citizen on December 8, 2007]
what give's the goverment the write to take money that should go to the pepole with cancer from smoken like me that could use it will being off work for cancer surgery to help pay my bills till i get back to work to pay your wages we payed all those high taxes on cigs all these years yea its my falt for having cancer for smoken but what gives you the write to take the money from us all smokers and exsmoker it shoud go to help people quite and medical expens ect
Reply

Line

2) Sen. Cassis "no vote explanation" [by Admin003 on August 2, 2007]
Senator Cassis, under her constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against concurring in the House amendments to the Senate substitute to House Bill No.4884 and moved that her statement be printed as her reasons for voting "no."

The motion prevailed.

Senator Cassis' statement is as follows:

I rise to express my "no" vote on House Bill No.4884. My "no" vote is consistent with my previous votes of nonsupport for the 21st century slush fund. I ask this question: "How can today's legislators make a promise that future legislators are not beholding to keep?"

Reply

Line

3) Sen. Schauer's "journal statment" [by Admin003 on June 29, 2007]
Senator Schauer's statement is as follows:

I would ask for your support of this amendment that merely preserves and codifies the 2007 budget agreement with regard to the transfer of $30 million from the 21st Century Jobs Fund to the General Fund. While that transfer from this fund should raise some concerns because in itself it is undermining our economic development efforts in this state, certainly, the breach of an agreement that would have repaid those funds is even worse. This is bad for business in this state.It's bad economic development policy, and unfortunately, it's breaking an agreement that would have repaid $30million that is being taken from the 21st Century Jobs Fund.

I would urge your support of this amendment.

Reply

Line


View Full Conversation