Introduced by Rep. Mark Meadows (D) on May 24, 2007, to give the Department Of Labor And Economic Growth the authority to increase without additional legislative authorization the annual licensing and other fees for a variety of professions that a person may not practice without acquiring a state license, including barbers, cosmetologists, manicurists, natural hair culturists, estheticians, electrologists, land surveyors, bill collectors, employment agencies and consultants, engineers, landscape architect, community planner, auctioneer, forester, hearing aid dealer, real estate brokers and salespersons, appraisers, builders, morticians, and occularists. In addition the bill would immediately increase the license fees on these professions by various amounts.
Referred to the House Appropriations Committee on May 24, 2007.
Substitute offered by Rep. Steve Tobocman (D) on September 23, 2007, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that does not give the Department Of Labor And Economic Growth the authority to increase without additional legislative authorization the annual licensing and other fees covered by the bill. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on September 23, 2007.
Passed 90 to 17 in the House on September 23, 2007, to extend until 2012 the level of annual licensing and other fees for a variety of professions that a person may not practice without acquiring a state license, including barbers, cosmetologists, manicurists, natural hair culturists, estheticians, electrologists, land surveyors, bill collectors, employment agencies and consultants, engineers, landscape architect, community planner, auctioneer, forester, hearing aid dealer, real estate brokers and salespersons, appraisers, builders, morticians, and occularists. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on September 23, 2007.
Referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee on September 23, 2007.
Reported in the Senate on September 27, 2007, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed 34 to 3 in the Senate on September 28, 2007, to extend until 2012 the level of annual licensing and other fees for a variety of professions that a person may not practice without acquiring a state license, including barbers, cosmetologists, manicurists, natural hair culturists, estheticians, electrologists, land surveyors, bill collectors, employment agencies and consultants, engineers, landscape architect, community planner, auctioneer, forester, hearing aid dealer, real estate brokers and salespersons, appraisers, builders, morticians, and occularists. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on September 30, 2007.
2) Because by Anonymous Citizen on June 15, 2007 The budget shortfall means that the cost of regulation cannot be totally covered by taxes. The fees allow those costs to be covered.
Fees can be challenged under the Constitution if they are excessive in comparison to the cost of regulation. File a suit if you think you can prove it. Reply
3) Hidden Tax Increase by Mike Hignite on May 29, 2007 ... that really isn't all that hidden. I have proposed eliminating all licensing fees of legal work.
License fees are now primarily additional sources of revenue and have nothing to do with keeping the public "safe" from shoddy work.
How does it suddenly become twice as expensive to regulate the licensing of movers, unless you had a state with a budget shortfall. Reply