Introduced by Rep. Barbara Farrah (D) on May 15, 2007, to repeal the mandatory motorcycle helmet requirement for a motorcycle operator who pays an extra $100 annual fee (or $200 for three years), has had a license for two years, and purchases extra insurance with $20,000 personal injury coverage. Passengers would have to pay another $100 (or $200) to ride helmetless. The bill also increases the penalties for riding helmetless without paying the extra fee. Those who have paid would get a license plate sticker indicating this.
Referred to the House Regulatory Reform Committee on May 15, 2007.
Reported in the House on May 29, 2007, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on October 11, 2007, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises various details, but does not change its substance. This version was subsequently superseded by the Farrah substitute, which has substantive changes. The substitute failed by voice vote in the House on October 11, 2007.
Substitute offered by Rep. Barbara Farrah (D) on October 11, 2007, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that has the same substantive changes as the Farrah substitute that was subsequenly adopted, but which also would have earmarked $1 million of the extra fee revenue to motorcycle safety training programs. The later version does not contain that earmark, but essentially just uses the new money to fund regular State Police operations that would otherwise be paid for with some other state taxes or fees (which will now be used to pay for something else). The substitute failed by voice vote in the House on October 11, 2007.
Substitute offered by Rep. Barbara Farrah (D) on October 11, 2007, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that does not require passenger to pay the extra fee to ride helmetless, and exempts out-of-state motorcycle operators who own their cycle from the mandatory helmet law (they would not have to pay the proposed extra fee). The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on October 11, 2007.
Passed 69 to 39 in the House on October 11, 2007, to repeal the mandatory motorcycle helmet requirement for a motorcycle operator who pays an extra $100 annual fee (or $200 for three years), has had a license for two years (or takes a safety course), and purchases extra insurance with $20,000 personal injury coverage. Passengers would have to pay another $100 (or $200) to ride helmetless. The bill also increases the penalties for riding helmetless without paying the extra fee. Those who have paid would get a license plate sticker indicating this. Out-of-state riders would not have to buy the permit if they own their motorcycle. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on October 16, 2007.
Referred to the Senate Economic Development and Regulatory Reform Committee on October 16, 2007.
Reported in the Senate on October 18, 2007, with the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on October 18, 2007, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on October 18, 2007.
Amendment offered by Sen. Tom George (R) on October 18, 2007, to tie-bar the bill to House Bill 5243, meaning this bill cannot become law unless that one does also. HB 5243 would require motorcyclists who choose to ride without a helmet to pay for the unlimited personal injury protection (PIP) required for other vehicle owners under the state no-fault automobile insurance law. The amendment failed by voice vote in the Senate on October 18, 2007.
Passed 23 to 15 in the Senate on October 18, 2007, to repeal the mandatory motorcycle helmet requirement for a motorcycle operator who pays an extra $100 annual fee (or $200 for three years), has had a license for two years (or takes a safety course), and purchases extra insurance with $20,000 personal injury coverage. Passengers would have to pay another $100 (or $200) to ride helmetless. The bill also increases the penalties for riding helmetless without paying the extra fee. Those who have paid would get a license plate sticker indicating this. Out-of-state riders would not have to buy the permit if they own their motorcycle. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the House on October 23, 2007.
Amendment offered by Rep. David Agema (R) on June 4, 2008, to eliminate the provision that requires motorcyclists to pay a fee to be exempt from the helmet mandate. The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on June 4, 2008.
1) Huh by Anonymous Citizen on July 29, 2008 "You may run into a cop with a bad attitude"
I haven't seen one in the last 20 years that didn't have a bad attitude. Most are ex- high school nerds on a power trip. Reply
2) Also by Anonymous Citizen on July 29, 2008
If you're going to ride helmetless, it's a good idea to do it with at least one other person. You can do it alone, but the bigger the group, the better. Also it is a good idea to have a DOT helmet with you. You may run into a cop with a bad attitude who may not let you leave without one. Reply
3) It's time for civil disobedience by Anonymous Citizen on July 2, 2008 Jennifer vetoed our bill (AGAIN). A veto override would be nice, but a lot of legislators probably only voted "yes" to get re-elected knowing full well that the bill would never see the light of day so long as Jennifer is still in office. Therefore an override probably won't happen.
Since our efforts failed legislatively, it's time to try the judicial route;
CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE
The law CANNOT be enforced as written. There is no such thing as a "D.O.T. approved" helmet. If you are an ABATE member and you get a no-helmet ticket, you will not only be represented in court free of charge, your fine will be paid if you lose the court case. There are 3 things;
1) You MUST be an ABATE member BEFORE you get a ticket, not after.
2) You MUST wear something on your head, even if it's just a bandana. Something you can claim as "your interpretation" of proper headgear.
3) If you do this you must not give the cops any reason to ticket you for anything else. Be sure you are properly licensed, insured, plates not expired, do not speed, and for God's sake, NO ALCOHOL!
For more info or to join ABATE, log on to abateofmichigan.org Reply