Introduced by Rep. Paul Condino (D) on April 24, 2007, to make “harassment” on the basis of a person’s religion, race, color, national origin, age, sex, height, weight, familial status, or marital status a violation of the state civil rights law. Currently under that law, a violation consists of practices, policies, or customs that discriminate specifically on the basis of these personal characteristics.
Referred to the House Judiciary Committee on April 24, 2007.
1) No one to pick on! by Anonymous Citizen on May 1, 2007 This would leave us with no one to pick on, except our esteemed politicians! Hmmmmm..... Reply
2) Another shining example.. by Anonymous Citizen on April 30, 2007 (or maybe, another stinking, steaming, fly-blown coiled brown peanut-and-corn-studded example)... of why we need a part-time legislature. Like, meets for three days every ten years or so. Inside a sagging barn near Marquette in February. Reply
3) Isn't this precious by Anonymous Citizen on April 29, 2007 Now terms like old man, old fart, skinny, shorty, buddah belly etc. will be a basis for a civil rights lawsuit? Why not throw in baldness, bad hair, ugly shoes, big feet etc?
Don't you people have anything else to do except make laws to make money for lawyers? Oh, I forgot, some of you are lawyers and areare backed by lawyers. Reply