Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2007 House Bill 4095: Go back to defined-benefit pension for state employees

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) big spender Vagnozzi  by Anonymous Citizen on September 7, 2007 
This bill is old and going nowhere, but it illustrates the mentality of legislators like Vagnozzi. Come to think of it, old and going nowhere describes Vagnozzzzzzi as well. A balanced budget with the likes of Aldo? Not without BIG tax increases.
Reply

Line

2) Retro Vagnozzi  by Anonymous Citizen on May 31, 2007 
Aldo is so old-style organized labor liberal thinking-living in the past in his thinking. Hey Aldo, how about a retro Michigan legislation?
Sponsor a bill which would turn back time for the former Great State of Michigan to, say, 1957, when the sun was rising on the state.
Reply

Line

3) Defined Benefit Plans Are Dinosaurs  by Mike Hignite on March 14, 2007 
No one wants them as the downside is too great. Unfunded liability, indeterminant future costs, plan overhead, actuarial costs make these plans unworkable.

Go to a 403(b) plan with a reasonable matching contribution. Then our brilliant, dedicated, intelligent, hardworking state workers can control one aspect of their retirement planning which won't be subject to the whims of future state legislators. Defined contribution plans are the way to go. Also, they are portable.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation