Introduced by Rep. Jerry Kooiman (R) on September 20, 2006, to impose a 48 month lifetime limit on cash welfare payments to able-bodied recipients, and establish recipient tracking, work and training requirements that conform with the limit.
Referred to the House Family and Childrens Services Committee on September 20, 2006.
Reported in the House on November 30, 2006, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on November 30, 2006, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that adds additional exceptions to the four-year welfare cap for individuals who are not able to work for various reasons, and additional circumstances that "stop the clock" on the four-year limit. The tolling of that time limit would be suspended if the unemployment rate in the recipient's county was 9 percent or more (vs. 10 percent in the introduced version). The substitute requires more rigorous tracking of welfare recipients by the Department of Human Services with the goal of determining how long they have been on welfare at various times. The substitute passed in the House by voice vote on November 30, 2006.
Passed in the House (61 to 41) on November 30, 2006, to impose a 48 month lifetime limit on cash welfare payments to able-bodied recipients (with a number of exceptions), and establish recipient tracking, work and training requirements that conform with the limit. A one-year extension could be granted under certain conditions, such as a mother with a child under age three. Sanctions would be imposed on recipients who fail to comply with work and training requirements (three months of no benefits for the first two failures, and one year for a third violation). The bill establishes more exceptions to the sanctions and the four-year cap than previous time limit legislation vetoed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm. Exceptions include mothers of a child less than age three, people who are temporarily disabled, or when the county unemployment rate exceeds nine percent. The four-year cap would not be retroactive. [Vote Details and Comments]
Motion by Rep. Chris Ward (R) on November 30, 2006, to give the bill immediate effect. The motion failed in the House (61 to 41) on November 30, 2006. [Vote Details and Comments]
Received in the Senate on December 6, 2006.
Referred to the Senate on December 6, 2006.
Substitute offered in the Senate on December 14, 2006, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that contains the results of negotiations between Republican and Democrat legislators on a welfare time limit proposal. See the Senate-passed version for details, and also House Bill 6587 and Senate Bills 1500 and 1501. The substitute passed in the Senate by voice vote on December 14, 2006.
Passed in the Senate (27 to 9) on December 14, 2006, to establish that an able bodied person may only collect cash welfare payments for 48 months during their lifetime, subject to exceptions defined by the Department of Human Services. (Previous welfare time limit bills previous time limit legislation vetoed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm did not grant the department this power to create exceptions.) The proposed statute itself contains exceptions for individuals who are mentally or physically disabled, have low intelligence or learning disabilities, and other conditions. The bill is prospective only – the clock starts ticking on recipients’ 48-month limits when a new government welfare-to-work program has gone into effect (Sept. 30, 3007) – and it contains many “clock stoppers” on the time limit, such as whenever the unemployment rate in the county a recipient lives in exceeds the state average by 25 percent. Recipients who fail to comply with work and training requirements would lose benefits for three months the first two times, and one year for a third violation. [Vote Details and Comments]
Received in the House on December 14, 2006, to establish that an able bodied person may only collect cash welfare payments for 48 months during their lifetime, subject to exceptions defined by the Department of Human Services. (Previous welfare time limit bills previous time limit legislation vetoed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm did not grant the department this power to create exceptions.) The proposed statute itself contains exceptions for individuals who are mentally or physically disabled, have low intelligence or learning disabilities, and other conditions. The bill is prospective only – the clock starts ticking on recipients’ 48-month limits when a new government welfare-to-work program has gone into effect (Sept. 30, 3007) – and it contains many “clock stoppers” on the time limit, such as whenever the unemployment rate in the county a recipient lives in exceeds the state average by 25 percent. Recipients who fail to comply with work and training requirements would lose benefits for three months the first two times, and one year for a third violation. Passed in the House (103 to 0) on December 14, 2006. [Vote Details and Comments]
Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on December 19, 2006.
1) classifieds [by Anonymous Citizen on March 27, 2008] to all people who are unemployed:
you all need to get a paper and get a classified ad and find a job and get a real life and keep youself busy and stop getting welfare checks it is a waste of tax dollars and you are just lazy and you need to get a job. Reply
2) thats to long [by Anonymous Citizen on December 6, 2007] 48 months is to long, they should be allowed 18 months over their lifetime, with no exceptions. I personally am tired of paying for people who constantly find new ways to scam people out of their hard earned money. Everyone should have to get jobs, no matter what, their are numerous work at home jobs disabled people could do to earn in income. Taxes are already through the roof, I personally would love to see Welfare totally stopped.
Do not try to eak through life on the success of others, and guess what, I am a hardworking individual who works hard 24/7. I didn't make money by sitting back collecting it off hard working americans. I went to college, and by the way, I dare you to say I cannot afford college, well their are so many programs to help people out with this it's not funny.
3) Rep. Cushingberry's "no vote explanation" [by Admin003 on December 2, 2006] Rep. Cushingberry, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:
"Mr. Speaker and Members of the House:
Happy Holidays to Michigan families struggling to survive. The outgoing House leadership continues it's assault on the poor. This bill presented to us within the past several hours has not been reviewed thoroughly and the substitute requires more than the cursory deliberation afforded members today.
In the budget process we learned there are really no 'able bodied' slothfully in receipt of our meager welfare benefits. Persons who are disabled, mentally and physically not covered in the myriad of other programs and families with children are who this is bill affects. This is not a requirement of any Federal law since the Governor's JET program is not truly implemented and it should be given an opportunity to succeed.
We need to take more time and carefully review such a drastic change in policy, especially since the national policy continues to ship jobs overseas
Earlier this year we passed further earned income tax credits for the working poor but this bill seems to fly against that positive development. The 67% income disregard could end up lowering the amount of income disregarded for those who need it the most (i.e. earn least, for example working mothers, those just transitioning back into the work force etc.).
This form of operation is the worst way to legislate, because it denigrates the appropriations process, and continues to weaken the committee system, a time honored and well proven tradition of the Michigan Legislature."