Introduced by Rep. Bill McConico (D) on June 21, 2006, to establish that the state Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act does not prohibit public school districts from establishing and maintaining a single-gender school, class, or program within a school if a comparable school, class, or program were made available to pupils of each gender. Under current law, the Act prohibits an educational institution from discriminating against a person because of religion, race, color, national origin, or sex.
Referred to the House Education Committee on June 21, 2006.
Substitute offered by Rep. Brian Palmer (R) on June 28, 2006, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on June 28, 2006.
Referred to the Senate Education Committee on June 29, 2006.
Reported in the Senate on August 2, 2006, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed 33 to 5 in the Senate on August 30, 2006, to establish that the state Elliott-Larsen Civil Rights Act does not prohibit public school districts from establishing and maintaining a single-gender school, class, or program within a school if a comparable school, class, or program were made available to pupils of each gender. Under current law, the Act prohibits an educational institution from discriminating against a person because of religion, race, color, national origin, or sex. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on September 1, 2006.
1) Wow, by Anonymous Citizen on December 11, 2006 If they dont want there children to go to a school with the opposite gender present then the parents should send them to a private school, where you have the availibility of single gender schools already. Public schools should stay diverse. Thats why there are private and public schools. Reply
2) focus on studies??? by Anonymous Citizen on October 31, 2006 what fantasy world are you living in?
if given their 'druthers', they would focus on everything BUT studies. and the absence of the opposite gender will heighten these phenomenon. Reply
3) I think this is a good idea because it allows students to by Anonymous Citizen on October 31, 2006 concentrate on the future careers. They will not get married for MANY years, so they could focus on studies. Reply