Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2005 Senate Bill 71: Require septic inspection on property transfer

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Septic System & Ground Water  by Mike Hignite on March 4, 2005 
Problems:
1. Inspection only done on sale. What about a bad septic system for someone living in the same house for thirty years?
2. Inspection of a septic system is complex. There is tank inspection, tile field inspection and ground perk/suitablity issues. A licensed pump-out expert may be able to do one, a soils engineer the others. Are you planning on requiring this on every sale? Who pays? Seller, buyer, county, all taxpayers? If I as a buyer am concerned, then I can require it as part of the purchase agreement and home inspection.
3. Again, I ask, has there been a huge social problem caused by septic system failure in Michigan? Where is the public benefit? Or is it simply another chance to raise revenue for the state/county?
Reply

Line

2) yes inspect our septic systems  by Anonymous Citizen on March 3, 2005 
Septic systems will be a significant environmental challenge to the states groundwater quality.
Reply

Line

3) No new sewer regs  by Mike Hignite on January 31, 2005 
Given the low quality of county inspections, I see no reason to add a new requirement to have a county inspect and approve septic tanks and CHARGE A FEE other than to slow down sales of real estate, and increase tax revenues to local government.

NO NEW TAXES!!!
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation