Introduced by Sen. Laura Toy (R) on June 16, 2005, to prohibit convicted sex offenders from residing, working, or loitering within a “student safety zone,” defined as an area within 1,000 feet of a school.
Referred to the Senate Education Committee on June 16, 2005.
Reported in the Senate on August 31, 2005, with the recommendation that the substitute (S-4) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on August 31, 2005, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that divides its provisions among this bill and House Bill 4932, and which reflects the revised application of the school safety zone provisions proposed by the House-passed version of Senate Bill 129. The substitute passed in the Senate by voice vote on August 31, 2005.
Passed in the Senate (36 to 0) on August 31, 2005, to prohibit certain convicted sex offenders on probation from residing within a “student safety zone,” defined as an area within 1,000 feet of a school. House Bill 4932 bans such offenders from working or loitering near a school. [Vote Details and Comments]
Received in the House on August 31, 2005.
Referred to the House Education Committee on August 31, 2005.
Reported in the House on September 7, 2005, without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the House (103 to 1) on September 7, 2005, to prohibit certain convicted sex offenders on probation from residing within a “student safety zone,” defined as an area within 1,000 feet of a school. House Bill 4932 bans such offenders from working or loitering near a school. [Vote Details and Comments]
Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on September 23, 2005.
1) BEAT THE REGISTRY [by Anonymous Citizen on September 25, 2008] GREAT!! HOPE IT REALLY WORKS Reply
2) Sex Offenders [by Anonymous Citizen on December 6, 2007] Personally, I am in favor of tools such as the sex offender registry for those of us who are law abiding to be aware of potential risks.....BUT putting someone's face, name, and entire family's reputation on the line for one offense seems a little too harsh....maybe appropriate for a 3rd time offender, but not for one incident.
I struggle with the fairness of putting sex offenders on a public registry like that, but not violent criminals. I would be more concerned about having a murderer living next door than someone who got a little too pushy with his/her spouse/significant other/date etc. and was convicted of sexual assault.
The punishment just doesn't seem to fit the crime. Reply
3) serious doubts [by Anonymous Citizen on August 8, 2006] both sides DO have serious doubts, and rightly so. there have been VERY few cases of true "rehabilitation" from our prison systems, especially in the sexual predator area.