Public Act 566 of 2006

      Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

• Introduced by Sen. Shirley Johnson (R) on March 16, 2005, to require a state agency or a private company that maintains computerized data with personalized information on individuals to notify those individuals if a breach of security allows unencrypted personal identifying information to be acquired by an unauthorized person. Also, to require the notification of law enforcement agencies and the state Attorney General. A person damaged by an unauthorized release could sue for actual damages and costs. The bill was introduced following news stories about hackers obtaining personal data on 145,000 persons from the ChoicePoint database company. ChoicePoint voluntarily performed the actions that would be required by the bill.
  • Referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee on March 16, 2005.
    • Reported in the Senate on November 30, 2006, with the recommendation that the substitute (S-5) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
  • Substitute offered in the Senate on November 30, 2006, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that refines and specifies procedures that would be required in various kinds of security breaches. Among other changes it requires the notification of credit reporting agencies if a breach could lead to cases of identity theft, and revises penalties. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on November 30, 2006.
• Passed 36 to 0 in the Senate on November 30, 2006, to require a state agency or a private company that maintains computerized data with personalized information on individuals to notify those individuals if a breach of security allows unencrypted personal identifying information to be acquired by an unauthorized person. The bill specifies allowable formats for the notices and the information to be included in the notice. Also, to require the notification of credit reporting agencies of a security breach that could lead to indentity theft. Failure to comply with the notification requirements would be punishable by civil fines of $1,000 for each individual affected by a security breach, up to a maximum of $2.5 million.
  Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
• Received in the House on November 30, 2006.
  • Referred to the House Banking and Financial Services Committee on November 30, 2006.
    • Reported in the House on December 5, 2006, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
  • Substitute offered in the House on December 13, 2006, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that lowers the proposed penalty for each failure to notify an individual to $250, up the an aggregate maximum of $750,000, and makes other minor revisions. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on December 13, 2006.
  • Amendment offered by Rep. David Robertson (R) on December 13, 2006, to exempt courts from the entities covered by the bill. The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on December 13, 2006.
  • Amendment offered by Rep. David Robertson (R) on December 13, 2006, to revise details the definition of "redacted" as it applies to personally identifying numbers (such as the last four digits of a person's social security number). The bill does not apply the same requirements to breaches of redacted information. The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on December 13, 2006.
• Passed 107 to 0 in the House on December 14, 2006, to require a state agency or a private company that maintains computerized data with personalized information on individuals to notify those individuals if a breach of security allows unencrypted personal identifying information to be acquired by an unauthorized person. The bill specifies allowable formats for the notices and the information to be included in the notice. Also, to require the notification of credit reporting agencies of a security breach that could lead to identity theft. Failure to comply with the notification requirements would be punishable by civil fines of $250 for each individual affected by a security breach, up to a maximum of $750,000.
  Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
• Received in the Senate on December 14, 2006, to concur with the House-passed version of the bill. Passed 36 to 0 in the Senate on December 14, 2006.
  Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
• Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on December 30, 2006.