Introduced by Sen. Jud Gilbert (R) on March 2, 2005, to require a local soil erosion control enforcing agency to issue a general permit for a residential project to a residential property owner for routine maintenance activities on a previously permitted seawall or similar structure, upon application and payment of a reasonable fee. Also, to exempt residential property owners from permit requirements for gardening, landscaping, household maintenance, fencing, and preventative measures used to stabilize soils.
Referred to the Senate Natural Resources & Environmental Affairs Committee on March 2, 2005.
Reported in the Senate on March 17, 2005, with the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on March 23, 2005, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that makes explicit several types of residential projects exempt from permit requirements. These include: an earth change of a minor nature; gardening, if the natural elevation of the area were not raised; digging post holes for fencing, decks, utility posts, mailboxes, etc.; normal and customary residential landscaping, including planting trees and shrubs, seeding or reseeding lawns less than one acre, and stockpiling less than 10 yards of soil, sand, or gravel at least 100 feet from state waters. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on March 23, 2005.
Amendment offered by Sen. Liz Brater (D) on March 24, 2005, to prohibit a homeowner from seeding or reseeding a lawn within 500 feet of a storm drain inlet without getting a permit. The amendment failed by voice vote in the Senate on March 24, 2005.
Amendment offered by Sen. Liz Brater (D) on March 24, 2005, to prohibit a homeowner from stockpiling 10 cubic yards or more of dirt or sand within 500 feet of a storm drain inlet without getting a permit. The amendment failed 16 to 21 in the Senate on March 24, 2005. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Passed 22 to 15 in the Senate on March 24, 2005, to exempt residential property owners from soil erosion control permit requirements for gardening, landscaping, household maintenance, fencing, and preventative measures used to stabilize soils (see Senate substitute vote for details). Also, to require a local soil erosion control enforcing agency to issue a general permit for a residential project to a property owner for routine maintenance activities on a previously permitted seawall or similar structure, upon application and payment of a reasonable fee. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the House on March 24, 2005.
Referred to the House Natural Resources, Great Lakes, Land Use, and Environment Committee on March 24, 2005.
Reported in the House on May 19, 2005, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on May 31, 2005, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that incorporates technical changes resulting from committee testimony and deliberation. This version was subsequently superceded by another substitute with more technical changes. The substitute failed by voice vote in the House on May 31, 2005.
Substitute offered by Rep. Phil Pavlov (R) on May 31, 2005, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that also exempts seawall maintenance that does not exceed 100 square feet from permit requirements, but eliminates the provisions related to "general" permits for a residential projects. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on May 31, 2005.
Amendment offered by Rep. Lorence Wenke (R) on May 31, 2005, to eliminate a provision allowing a homeowner to stockpile 10 cubic yards or more of dirt or sand within 100 feet of a storm drain inlet without getting a permit. The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on May 31, 2005.
Passed 107 to 0 in the House on June 1, 2005, to exempt residential property owners from soil erosion control permit requirements for gardening, landscaping, household maintenance, fencing, and preventative measures used to stabilize soils (see Senate substitute vote for details), and also exempts small seawall repairs. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
1) Sen. Patterson's "journal statement" by Admin003 on March 25, 2005 Senator Patterson, under his constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against the adoption of the amendments offered by Senator Brater to Senate Bill No.282.
Senator Patterson's statement is as follows:
I understand the spirit and intent of the previous speaker and her amendment. Unfortunately, I think this is one of the situations where the law would allow for local ordinances to tailor-make, for specific instances, the appropriate protections for our natural resources. Five hundred feet, under certain circumstances, might be very excessive and under other circumstances, it might be arbitrary and capriciously low. If we leave this to the locals, which was originally intended, we can come up with a tailor-made situation for each instance.
2) 2005 Senate Bill 282 (Revise DEQ soil erosion permits ) by admin on January 1, 2001 Introduced in the Senate on March 2, 2005, to exempt residential property owners from soil erosion control permit requirements for gardening, landscaping, household maintenance, fencing, and preventative measures used to stabilize soils (see Senate substitute vote for details). Also, to require a local soil erosion control enforcing agency to issue a general permit for a residential project to a property owner for routine maintenance activities on a previously permitted seawall or similar structure, upon application and payment of a reasonable fee
The vote was 22 in favor, 15 opposed and 1 not voting