Introduced by Sen. Michael Switalski (D) on March 2, 2005, the executive recommendation for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005-2006 community colleges budget. This appropriates $281.3 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $285.7 million, which was the FY 2004-2005 amount enrolled in 2004. All of this comes from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues). Much more information on Michigan’s budget is available at Hot Topics: Michigan’s Budget Challenge at www.mackinac.org/4964.
Referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee on March 2, 2005.
Reported in the Senate on June 14, 2005.
Substitute offered in the Senate on June 14, 2005, to replace the executive proposal for this budget with one that expresses minor policy differences between the Republican-majority in the Senate and Governor Jennifer Granholm on certain spending items and funding sources. For much more detail see analysis from the non-partisan Senate Fiscal Agency. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on June 14, 2005.
Passed 34 to 3 in the Senate on June 14, 2005, the Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005-2006 community colleges budget. This appropriates $278.7 million in adjusted gross spending, compared to $285.7 million, which was the FY 2004-2005 amount enrolled in 2004. All of this comes from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues). Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the House on June 16, 2005.
Referred to the House Appropriations Committee on June 16, 2005.
Reported in the House on June 28, 2005, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on June 28, 2005, to replace the Senate-passed version of this budget with one that “strips” all actual appropriations. See House-passed version for explanation. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on June 28, 2005.
Passed 102 to 0 in the House on June 28, 2005, to send the bill back to the Senate "stripped" of all actual appropriations, leaving it in its original form as a "template" or "placeholder." This vote is basically a procedural method of launching negotiations to work out the differences between the House and Senate budgets. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on June 29, 2005.
Failed 0 to 36 in the Senate on June 30, 2005, to concur with a House-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on September 13, 2005.
Referred by Sen. Beverly Hammerstrom (R) on October 11, 2005.
1) 2005 Senate Bill 266 (Appropriations: 2005-2006 Community Colleges budget ) by admin on January 1, 2001 Introduced in the Senate on March 2, 2005, the Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005-2006 community colleges budget. This appropriates $278.7 million in adjusted gross spending, compared to $285.7 million, which was the FY 2004-2005 amount enrolled in 2004. All of this comes from the general fund (funded by actual state tax revenues)
The vote was 34 in favor, 3 opposed and 1 not voting