Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2005 Senate Bill 226: Establish agriculture and rural community commission

Public Act 47 of 2005

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) State Rep. John Garfield  by Anonymous Citizen on April 22, 2006 
Here we go again. Another commission. We don't need all these commissions and more government intervention.
Reply

Line

2) Rep. Waters' "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on June 2, 2005 
Rep. Waters, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on SB 226 because this bill is just one more attack on the DEQ. It is interesting to note that this bill comes soon after the implementation of a comprehensive set of administrative rules that regulate the storage and disposal of manure on large factory farms and prohibits manure from running into rivers and streams. If such a discussion is going to take place then the environmental community should also be involved.

Furthermore, the bill is far too limited in scope by defining rural counties as those having a population of 70,000 or less. The bill advocates a discussion of the laws, rules, and policies administered by the DEQ that affect farmers, food processors, and agribusiness. Agriculture has a significant presence in every county in Michigan. This restriction eliminates nearly half of Michigan counties from this discussion. Supporters of the bill have not been able to provide a rational argument for this arbitrary number."

Reply

Line

3) Rep. Hood's "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on June 2, 2005 
Rep. Hood, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on SB 226 because this bill is just one more attack on the DEQ. It is interesting to note that this bill comes soon after the implementation of a comprehensive set of administrative rules that regulate the storage and disposal of manure on large factory farms and prohibits manure from running into rivers and streams. If such a discussion is going to take place then the environmental community should also be involved.

Furthermore, the bill is far too limited in scope by defining rural counties as those having a population of 70,000 or less. The bill advocates a discussion of the laws, rules, and policies administered by the DEQ that affect farmers, food processors, and agribusiness. Agriculture has a significant presence in every county in Michigan. This restriction eliminates nearly half of Michigan counties from this discussion. Supporters of the bill have not been able to provide a rational argument for this arbitrary number."

Reply

Line


View Full Conversation