Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2005 Senate Bill 189: Ban ephedrine “point of purchase” displays

Public Act 87 of 2005

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Shame on me  by Anonymous Citizen on December 20, 2005 
for not watching what my government is doing. This is stupid legislation that does nothing except inconveniance honest citizens. Why not petition the FDA to revoke it's over the counter status so we would have to get a presciption and drive the cost up too?
Reply

Line

2) Sen. Birkholz's "journal statement"  by Admin003 on July 1, 2005 
Senator Birkholz asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the statement be printed in the Journal.

The motion prevailed.

Senator Birkholz's statement is as follows:

Members, today we have the final vote dealing with methamphetamine use and dealing with the only ingredient that is necessary. There are several ingredients that can be substituted in the making of meth. There is one ingredient that does not have a substitute and that is pseudoephedrine and ephedrine. This legislation will require that those, items pseudoephedrine or ephedrine, be kept either behind the counter in a store, or if it is more accessible, it will require security devices and signing for with a photo ID.

So we are going to limit the accessibility only to those 18 years of age and older and they will not be allowed to buy more than 48 tablets at a time or two packages. This will help deal with the access to the making of methamphetamine, a scourge on our communities across the state affecting families and children.

Leaving people addicted usually after the first use, 90 percent of those who use it are totally addicted after the second use. We want to help end this in our communities, and we want to help prevent any more people from being attracted to the drug initially and becoming addicted to it.

This past week, we held a conference in Kalamazoo for law enforcement people, for people from the judicial community, and people from the rehabilitation community to try to find better ways of helping people who are addicted to this horrible scourge of getting off the drug. It is very hard. The traditional treatment methods do not work.

We had over 500 people attend the conference that we had hoped to have about 200 attendees. We had to turn away another 100 people. You can see the magnitude of this problem and how it is affecting our communities. So by passing this legislation today and sending it on to the Governor, you're going to help make your communities a better place to live and help those families who are intending or who have the propensity to become the addicts of the future.

I appreciate the support that you have given us. This legislation has not been easy to negotiate. It's been a challenge, but we have succeeded, and I know that we will be making a difference with your vote today. Thank you for your support, and we continue to look for more solutions to this problem in our communities.

Reply

Line

3) OVERLEGISLATION AGAIN  by Anonymous Citizen on June 14, 2005 
Come on, let's get some common sense and stop trying to enact a law for every possible situation that can occur in life. What is happening to our common sense and individual ability to recognize illegal activities. If someone comes in to a store and tries to purchase 400 boxes of pseudoephedrine wouldn't COMMON SENSE tell the sales person that something is wrong here???? Why make a 70 year old grandmother show here ID to purchase over the counter cold medication!!!
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation