Introduced by Sen. Patricia Birkholz (R) on February 10, 2005, to prohibit retail “point of purchase” displays for over-the-counter medicines containing just pseudoephedrine or ephedrine. These products could only be kept behind the counter, and merchants would be required to see a buyer’s photo identification before selling these products, and require buyers to sign a log indicating how much was purchased.
Referred to the Senate Health Policy Committee on February 10, 2005.
Reported in the Senate on May 10, 2005, with the recommendation that the substitute (S-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on May 12, 2005, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that gives retailers three options. First, they could keep the products behind a counter or in a locked case, in which case the sales log would not be required. Second, they could keep the products where the store attendant could monitor them, in which case they would have to attach anti-theft device to the products. Third, they could keep them in another part of the store, with the antitheft device and with constant video surveillance. The amended substitute would prohibit using the names on the proposed sales log for marketing purposes, and bans the sale of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine products to a person under 18 years old. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on May 12, 2005.
Passed 36 to 1 in the Senate on May 12, 2005, to restrict retail “point of purchase” displays for over-the-counter medicines containing just pseudoephedrine or ephedrine, and ban their sale to a person under 18 years old. Merchants would be required to see a buyer’s photo identification before selling these products. Unless the products were kept behind the counter or in a locked case, merchants would be required to maintain video surveillance and/or attach antitheft devices to each package, and to maintain a log detailing the quantity and purchaser for each sale. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the House on May 17, 2005.
Referred to the House Judiciary Committee on May 17, 2005.
Reported in the House on June 1, 2005, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on June 7, 2005, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that splits its provisions with House Bill 4322, clarifies the three ways retailers can maintain ephedrine and pseudoephedrine products, and does not invalidate current local ordinances related to this issue, but prohibits new ones. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on June 7, 2005.
Amendment offered by Rep. Rick Jones (R) on June 7, 2005, to require more complete surveillance records from the proposed store video surveillance of ephedrine or pseudoephedrine displays. The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on June 7, 2005.
Passed 107 to 2 in the House on June 8, 2005, to restrict retail “point of purchase” displays for over-the-counter medicines containing just pseudoephedrine or ephedrine, and ban their sale to a person under 18 years old. Merchants would be required to see a buyer’s photo identification before selling these products. Unless the products were kept behind the counter or in a locked case, merchants would be required to maintain video surveillance and/or attach antitheft devices to each package, and to maintain a log detailing the quantity and purchaser for each sale. These provisions are divided between this and House Bill 4322. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
1) Shame on me by Anonymous Citizen on December 20, 2005 for not watching what my government is doing. This is stupid legislation that does nothing except inconveniance honest citizens. Why not petition the FDA to revoke it's over the counter status so we would have to get a presciption and drive the cost up too? Reply
2) Sen. Birkholz's "journal statement" by Admin003 on July 1, 2005 Senator Birkholz asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the statement be printed in the Journal.
The motion prevailed.
Senator Birkholz's statement is as follows:
Members, today we have the final vote dealing with methamphetamine use and dealing with the only ingredient that is necessary. There are several ingredients that can be substituted in the making of meth. There is one ingredient that does not have a substitute and that is pseudoephedrine and ephedrine. This legislation will require that those, items pseudoephedrine or ephedrine, be kept either behind the counter in a store, or if it is more accessible, it will require security devices and signing for with a photo ID.
So we are going to limit the accessibility only to those 18 years of age and older and they will not be allowed to buy more than 48 tablets at a time or two packages. This will help deal with the access to the making of methamphetamine, a scourge on our communities across the state affecting families and children.
Leaving people addicted usually after the first use, 90 percent of those who use it are totally addicted after the second use. We want to help end this in our communities, and we want to help prevent any more people from being attracted to the drug initially and becoming addicted to it.
This past week, we held a conference in Kalamazoo for law enforcement people, for people from the judicial community, and people from the rehabilitation community to try to find better ways of helping people who are addicted to this horrible scourge of getting off the drug. It is very hard. The traditional treatment methods do not work.
We had over 500 people attend the conference that we had hoped to have about 200 attendees. We had to turn away another 100 people. You can see the magnitude of this problem and how it is affecting our communities. So by passing this legislation today and sending it on to the Governor, you're going to help make your communities a better place to live and help those families who are intending or who have the propensity to become the addicts of the future.
I appreciate the support that you have given us. This legislation has not been easy to negotiate. It's been a challenge, but we have succeeded, and I know that we will be making a difference with your vote today. Thank you for your support, and we continue to look for more solutions to this problem in our communities.
3) OVERLEGISLATION AGAIN by Anonymous Citizen on June 14, 2005 Come on, let's get some common sense and stop trying to enact a law for every possible situation that can occur in life. What is happening to our common sense and individual ability to recognize illegal activities. If someone comes in to a store and tries to purchase 400 boxes of pseudoephedrine wouldn't COMMON SENSE tell the sales person that something is wrong here???? Why make a 70 year old grandmother show here ID to purchase over the counter cold medication!!! Reply