Introduced by Sen. Alan Sanborn (R) on February 1, 2005, to establish penalties for a person who has been convicted of certain sex crimes or drunk driving and who takes a coach position on an independent youth athletic team without disclosing his or her record to the organization sanctioning the team.
Referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee on February 1, 2005.
Reported in the Senate on May 4, 2005, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Referred to the House Judiciary Committee on May 10, 2005.
Reported in the House on June 28, 2005, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on June 29, 2005, to also require youth leagues to check the sex offenders registry before employing or allowing a person to volunteer, and not allow the participation of someone on the list. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on June 29, 2005.
Passed 107 to 0 in the House on June 29, 2005, to prohibit registered sex offenders from working or volunteering at child care organizations, prohibit youth leagues and organizations from employing or allowing to volunteer persons on the sex offender registry, require youth leagues and organizations to check the sex offenders registry before employing or allowing a person to volunteer, and provide penalties for violation. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on June 30, 2005.
Substitute offered by Sen. Alan Sanborn (R) on September 27, 2005, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that removes the House-passed provisions that also require youth leagues to check the sex offenders registry before employing or allowing a person to volunteer, and not allow the participation of someone on the list. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on September 27, 2005.
Passed 36 to 0 in the Senate on September 27, 2005, to concur with the House-passed version of the bill, but only after stripping out the House-passed provision that also requires youth leagues to check the sex offenders registry before employing or allowing a person to volunteer. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the House on September 27, 2005.
Referred to the House Judiciary Committee on February 28, 2006.
1) sex registry by Anonymous Citizen on February 11, 2006 what if someone has a csc conviction but is now off the registry?..are they allowed to coach as long as they report it to the league leader s they coach for? or are they alllowed to coach without disclosing it since they are no longer on the registry? Reply
2) sex registry by Anonymous Citizen on February 11, 2006 what if someone has a csc conviction but is now off the registry?..are they allowed to coach as long as they report it to the league leader s they coach for? or are they alllowed to coach without disclosing it since they are no longer on the registry? Reply
3) Sex Registry not working by Anonymous Citizen on August 27, 2005 This Sex offender Registry is a waste of Goverment time. The way Michigan has it set up so many names on it that should not be on it as they are not a public danger as the writter says its time for the State to set up a review system... What is the problem elected officials you think people will think you are soft on crime. Reply