Introduced by Rep. Mike Nofs (R) on October 6, 2005, to make all criminal history information in state police databases be disseminated in response to a fingerprint-based or name-based search of the criminal history record database, including records of arrests that did not result in convictions. This information is a public record but does not appear in the current record check reports.
Referred to the House Judiciary Committee on October 6, 2005.
Reported in the House on October 20, 2005, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on November 2, 2005, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described. The substitute passed in the House by voice vote on November 2, 2005.
Amendment offered by Rep. Mike Nofs (R) on November 2, 2005, to clarify the definition of the fingerprint records specified in the bill. The amendment passed in the House by voice vote on November 2, 2005.
Referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee on November 8, 2005.
Reported in the Senate on November 30, 2005, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed in the Senate (26 to 11) on December 6, 2005, to make all criminal history information in state police databases be disseminated in response to a fingerprint-based or name-based search of the criminal history record database, including records of arrests that did not result in convictions. This information is a public record but does not appear in the current record check reports. [Vote Details and Comments]
Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on December 22, 2005.
1) 2005 House Bill 5276 (Clarify criminal record information releases ) [by admin on January 1, 2001] Introduced in the House on October 6, 2005, to make all criminal history information in state police databases be disseminated in response to a fingerprint-based or name-based search of the criminal history record database, including records of arrests that did not result in convictions. This information is a public record but does not appear in the current record check reports
The vote was 82 in favor, 21 opposed and 7 not voting