2005 House Bill 5267 (Establish joint custody presumption )

[Comments on this legislation] [Post new comment] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

Introduced by Rep. Leslie Mortimer (R) on October 6, 2005, to establish that in a custody dispute between parents, a court must order joint custody unless it determines by clear and convincing evidence that a parent is unfit, unwilling, or unable to care for the child; or unless the parent moves outside the school district and is unable to maintain the child's school schedule without interruption. In that case, the court must order that the parents submit to mediation to determine a custody agreement that maximizes both parents' ability to participate equally in a relationship with their child while accommodating the child's school schedule.
- Referred to the House Family and Childrens Services Committee on October 6, 2005.

Most Recent Comments

1) It's a great bill!! [by Anonymous Citizen on April 29, 2008]
Please, pass it!!

Reply

Line

2) H B 2567 DAD"S LOVE TOO [by Anonymous Citizen on February 25, 2008]
Why do the judges think Dad's aren't equal to Mom'S? come on pass equal 50/50 shared parenting. Children need Dad too. A Dad living in the same school district should have HIS children wit him as much as Mom does 3 blocks away. pass HB # 5267
Reply

Line

3) Paternity slaves are innocent [by Anonymous Citizen on December 13, 2007]
Paternity law have to be voted on for child rights
but ,people like Paula Roberts a lawyer for CLASP
who stated--what the father trying to say he doesn't want anything to do with child,after DNA test.

Well here a Question for Paula--Whats the Mother
trying to say or do to child, lied to child,fraud
and do more harm. NON-biological men should NOT be another mans PATERNITY SLAVE. If mother would told
the truth in first place,children wouldNOT suffer,
and real father would pay,thereby NO one is harmed.
Reply

Line

View Full Conversation