Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2005 House Bill 4617: Establish dioxin cleanup determination standards

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Where does protecting the PEOPLE fit in?  by Anonymous Citizen on April 24, 2006 
?
Reply

Line

2) Blood testing would get to the heart of dioxin problem, now wouldn't it.  by Anonymous Citizen on April 24, 2006 
The health of residents near a dry cleaning place that poured its solvent into the water table said it all. Dying of cancer. Wish more people knew about that! We need manufacturing, but...at what cost! There must be a better way!
Reply

Line

3) Sen. Schauer's "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on December 8, 2005 
Senator Schauer, under his constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against the passage of House Bill No.4617 and moved that the statement he made during the discussion of the bill be printed as his reasons for voting "no."

The motion prevailed.

Senator Schauer's statement is as follows:

I rise to strongly oppose this bill before us. It's unfortunate that it is being run all the way and there are such extreme differences of opinion as to whether this bill would actually accomplish the goal of protecting our environment and protecting property values. In fact, the sad irony to this is this bill would do quite the opposite of what proponents suggested it would do. This bill would make it much more difficult to assure the environmental remediation and environmental protection for property owners that the bill states that it would. It would also be detrimental to economic development efforts that are obviously critical to all of our communities. So I would strongly urge my colleagues oppose this bill.

Reply

Line


View Full Conversation