Introduced by Rep. Philip LaJoy (R) on April 13, 2005, to consider traffic signs and signal devices as capital assets in governmental accounting, rather than an expense.
Referred to the House Transportation Committee on April 13, 2005.
Reported in the House on April 26, 2005, without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Amendment offered by Rep. Philip LaJoy (R) on May 5, 2005, to define "installing traffic signs and signal devices" as roadway system "preservation," rather than "routine maintenance". The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on May 5, 2005.
Referred to the Senate Transportation Committee on May 11, 2005.
Reported in the Senate on May 19, 2005, with the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on May 24, 2005, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on May 24, 2005.
Passed 36 to 0 in the Senate on May 25, 2005, to consider traffic signs and signal devices as capital assets in governmental accounting, rather than an expense. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
1) Explanation by Anonymous Citizen on August 1, 2006 Sen. Cassis was in the Joint Senate Finance and House Tax Policy Committee meeting which ran longer than expected and therefore she missed a vote at the beginning of session on this day. See Senate Journal 75 page 1229 for her Statement and vote intention. Reply
2) 2005 House Bill 4602 (Revise “road maintenance” definition ) by admin on January 1, 2001 Introduced in the House on April 13, 2005, to consider traffic signs and signal devices as capital assets in governmental accounting, rather than an expense
The vote was 108 in favor, 0 opposed and 2 not voting