Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2005 House Bill 4228: Require permanent absentee voter listings

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Rep. Bieda's "no vote statement"  by Admin003 on March 4, 2006 
Rep. Bieda, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted 'no' on House Bill 4228 because certain amendments adopted minutes before the vote on final passage takes from local clerks and transfers it to the Michigan Secretary of State. We did not have the advantage of even knowing that the Michigan Secretary of State has the capability to take on this job, notwithstanding the concern that this would rob governmental units of their local control. The two communities that I represent, Warren and Sterling Heights, have had an excellent record in this regard, and I do not see HB 4228 as amended moments before final passage as offering any improvements. Thus, I voted 'no' on HB 4228."

Reply

Line

2) Rep. Tobocman's "no vote statement"  by Admin003 on March 4, 2006 
Rep. Tobocman, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on HB 4228 on final passage because it is bad public policy. The media's exposure of less than 150 inaccurate votes among the millions of eligible voters is not reason for such drastic changes that will have a negative impact. Hundreds of thousands of voters have come to expect an absentee voter application in the mail and today's legislation will deprive them of that privilege. It will undoubtedly cause thousands of seniors to no longer vote.

Additionally, I am concerned that the requirement to remove felons who are locked in prison from the voting rolls (when they are already ineligible to vote), will disenfranchise former prisoners when they are let out. The bill does not prescribe a formal or systematic process to add these legitimate voters back to the rolls upon their release. The bill raises Headlee concerns by placing an unfunded requirement on the Director of the Department of Corrections.

Rather than concentrating on how to make voting more difficult, America needs to be focusing on how to expand participation. Rather than placing new encumbrances on the voting process, especially for our seniors, we should be working on strategies (like no reason absentee voting, mail-in voting, and internet voting) that expand participation in our democratic system. Indeed, isn't that, in part, what our soldiers are allegedly fighting and dying for in the Middle East."

Reply

Line

3) Rep. Waters' "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on March 4, 2006 
Rep. Waters, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on HB 4228 upon its final passage because it is bad public policy. This bill takes power from local clerks and gives to the Lansing based Secretary of State. Local clerks have an excellent reputation for keeping voter records for their municipality. It robs governmental units of their local control.

HB 4228 also is a Headlee mandate by requiring the Director of Corrections (DOC) to provide a monthly felon list to Secretary of State."

Reply

Line


View Full Conversation