Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2004 Senate Bill 1067 (Appropriations: 2005 higher education budget)

Public Act 352 of 2004

[Comments on this legislation] [Post new comment] [Text and Analysis] [Add to Watch List]
[Previous] [Next]

Most Recent Comments

1) Sensible? [by Anonymous Citizen on June 17, 2004]
What isn't sensible is denying a qualified student admission because their skin color does not satisfy the decorating tastes of some social engineers. Some groups complain that there are "too many" Asians in the schools. Should they be denied admission because of their skin color, or should the fact that they have a better work ethic, study habits, and grades qualify them? They try harder. They also have a pride in their personal accomplishments vs "racial pride" and/or a group mentality.

Some use the term "diversity" to justify racial preferences. This is saying a persons worth to a class of students can be determined by their skin color. Isn't that "profiling"? What next? Determining their vote value by skin color?

Stop legacy admissions? Sure, then the alumini can take the millions they contribute to places like the U of M and send it to other schools, the ones that their kids will be going to.
Reply

Line

2) Court ruling [by Anonymous Citizen on June 16, 2004]
The Supreme Court, in a narrow 5-4 ruling with Reagan appointee Sandra Day O'Connor as the swing vote decided that race may be considered into the admissions criteria, but cannot be the deciding factor. O'Connor said the issue should be revisited in 25 years. In other words, she suspended the equal protection granted by the 14th amendment, for 25 years.

The UofM is sidestepping the issue by requiring and judging essays as a part of the admission process. That is highly subjective and gives the edge to those that press the right buttons of the liberals reviewing the essays.


Reply

Line

3) 300 years [by Anonymous Citizen on June 16, 2004]
So, am I to assume that you feel racial preferences (sometimes called reverse discrimination) should continue for 300 years? Starting when? I thought we were not supposed to judge peoples worth based on their skin color. Preferential treatment divides people into classes by race, sex, ethnicity etc. That is discrimination.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation