Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2004 House Bill 6073: Require Internet cigarette sale warnings

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Hmmmmm?  by MCP-001 on August 22, 2004 
Regulating interstate commerce has always been within the purview of the federal government, not Lansing.

It appears that the good representative requires a remedial civics lesson in how things actually work.

If his colleagues wish to demonstrate that they are aware of this basic fact, then they should allow this bill to die in committee.

Reply

Line

2) Internet taxes on cigarettes  by Anonymous Citizen on August 21, 2004 
Is our State Legislature now trying to overturn the U.S. Supreme Court nexus standards? Add this to the new law that is tempting Michigan citizens of majority age to become common criminals or felons for wanting to enjoy their tobacco products without footing the bill for the State's budgetary woes (not to mention putting brick & mortar tobacconists out of business, subjecting the same to more theft, promoting "big-time" smuggling, etc). Let's just erect barbed-wire around our border, shall we?
Reply

Line

3) CIGARETTE TAX  by Anonymous Citizen on July 27, 2004 
Do we need another unenforcable law?

This type of bill would need to be at the federal level to do anything.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation