Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2004 House Bill 5516: Appropriations: 2005 Family Independence Agency budget

Public Act 344 of 2004

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) What a waste.  by WilliamAkbarX on June 3, 2004 
Martha Scott,is suppose to be a Highland Parker, and Thank God this bill was thrown in the trast bin.Martha Scott,the people here in Highland Park,elected you to represent us.Where is a bill in the senate that was created to solve our water issue?
Reply

Line

2) Sen. Scott's "no vote comment"  by Admin003 on June 3, 2004 
Senator Scott, under her constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against the passage of House Bill No. 5516 and moved that the statement she made during the discussion of the bill be printed as her reasons for voting "no."

The motion prevailed.

Senator Scott's statement is as follows:

Earlier I was going to support this, and I told the chair of that committee that I would. But there have been amendments put on since then that I cannot live with. I cannot pit one person against another. As I indicated earlier, we're all God's children. Those are our most vulnerable people, especially our children, where we're not willing to put the money where we ought to put it. Yes, I understand that we do have a lot of violence in this state, in more ways than one, but I cannot in good conscience vote for this because of what we have debated here today.

Normally, when I give my word, it's my bond, but there were changes here that I can't live with. So I'll be voting "no" on this and would encourage my colleagues to do so.

Reply

Line

3) "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on June 3, 2004 
Senators Birkholz and Cropsey, under their constitutional right of protest (Art. 4, Sec. 18), protested against the adoption of the amendment offered by Senator Schauer to House Bill No. 5516.

Senator Birkholz moved that the statement she made during the discussion of the amendment be printed as her reasons for voting "no."

The motion prevailed.

Senator Birkholz's statement, in which Senator Cropsey concurred, is as follows:

Domestic violence is horrible. It's a scourge on our society. It's a sin against women and children. All I'm asking for is the money that's allocated to my county and is not being received by my county's residents. I'm not asking for more or less. I'm just asking for the money that is due them to be able to get to them to give them the service that they need. I urge you to defeat this amendment.

Reply

Line


View Full Conversation