Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2003 Senate Bill 875: Tax breaks for "start-up business"

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Rep. Accavitti's "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on April 29, 2004 
Rep. Accavitti, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on the companion package of bills to HB 5331 which were deemed to assist 'start-up' businesses (HB 5335, 5341-43, 5345; SB 863, 865, 867, 872, 875) because they will actually amount to very little in terms of tax relief to business but will cost the state treasury up to $15 million at a time when, if revenues are not increased, significant reductions will have to take place in programs to seniors, education and health care.

The bills also have the potential of undermining existing economic development programs and incentives and pitting local units against each other in the race to land businesses. Local units will again be forced to choose."

Reply

Line

2) 2003 Senate Bill 875 (Tax breaks for "start-up business")  by admin on January 1, 2001 
Introduced in the Senate on December 3, 2003, to exempt for five years a "qualified start-up business" from the "city utility users tax." A "qualified start-up business" is defined as a firm that has fewer than 25 full-time equivalent employees, has annual sales of less than $1 million, has research and development expenses that make up at least 15-percent of its annual expenses, is not publicly traded, and did not have net income for two consecutive tax years. This does not necessarily apply only to new firms, and the proposed five year exemption is not necessarily the firm's first five years of operation

The vote was 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 not voting

(Senate Roll Call 46 at Senate Journal 13)

Click here to view bill details.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation