Introduced by Sen. Jud Gilbert (R) on December 3, 2003, to exempt for five years a "qualified start-up business" from the "city utility users tax." A "qualified start-up business" is defined as a firm that has fewer than 25 full-time equivalent employees, has annual sales of less than $1 million, has research and development expenses that make up at least 15-percent of its annual expenses, and is not publicly traded. This does not necessarily apply only to new firms, and the five year exemption is not necessarily the firm's first five years of operation.
Referred to the Senate Economic Development, Small Business and Regulatory Reform Committee on December 3, 2003.
Reported in the Senate on December 17, 2003, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Passed 36 to 1 in the Senate on February 11, 2004, to exempt for five years a "qualified start-up business" from the "city utility users tax." A "qualified start-up business" is defined as a firm that has fewer than 25 full-time equivalent employees, has annual sales of less than $1 million, has research and development expenses that make up at least 15-percent of its annual expenses, is not publicly traded, and did not have net income for two consecutive tax years. This does not necessarily apply only to new firms, and the proposed five year exemption is not necessarily the firm's first five years of operation. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the House on February 11, 2004.
Referred to the House Commerce Committee on February 11, 2004.
Referred to the House Tax Policy Committee on February 12, 2004.
Reported in the House on April 21, 2004, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-3) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on April 27, 2004, to exempt a "qualified start-up business" from paying property tax for five years. A "qualified start-up business" is defined as a firm that has fewer than 25 full-time equivalent employees, has annual sales of less than $1 million, has research and development expenses that make up at least 15-percent of its annual expenses, and is not publicly traded. This does not necessarily apply only to new firms, and the five year exemption is not necessarily the firm's first five years of operation. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on April 27, 2004.
Amendment offered by Rep. Lorence Wenke (R) on April 27, 2004, to tie-bar the bill to House Bill 5331, meaning this bill cannot become law unless that one does also. The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on April 27, 2004.
Passed 80 to 27 in the House on April 27, 2004, to exempt for five years a "qualified start-up business" from the "city utility users tax." A "qualified start-up business" is defined as a firm that has fewer than 25 full-time equivalent employees, has annual sales of less than $1 million, has research and development expenses that make up at least 15-percent of its annual expenses, is not publicly traded, and did not have net income for two consecutive tax years. This does not necessarily apply only to new firms, and the proposed five year exemption is not necessarily the firm's first five years of operation. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
1) Rep. Accavitti's "no vote explanation" by Admin003 on April 29, 2004 Rep. Accavitti, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:
"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
I voted no on the companion package of bills to HB 5331 which were deemed to assist 'start-up' businesses (HB 5335, 5341-43, 5345; SB 863, 865, 867, 872, 875) because they will actually amount to very little in terms of tax relief to business but will cost the state treasury up to $15 million at a time when, if revenues are not increased, significant reductions will have to take place in programs to seniors, education and health care.
The bills also have the potential of undermining existing economic development programs and incentives and pitting local units against each other in the race to land businesses. Local units will again be forced to choose."
2) 2003 Senate Bill 875 (Tax breaks for "start-up business") by admin on January 1, 2001 Introduced in the Senate on December 3, 2003, to exempt for five years a "qualified start-up business" from the "city utility users tax." A "qualified start-up business" is defined as a firm that has fewer than 25 full-time equivalent employees, has annual sales of less than $1 million, has research and development expenses that make up at least 15-percent of its annual expenses, is not publicly traded, and did not have net income for two consecutive tax years. This does not necessarily apply only to new firms, and the proposed five year exemption is not necessarily the firm's first five years of operation
The vote was 36 in favor, 1 opposed and 1 not voting