Introduced by Sen. Laura Toy (R) on July 15, 2003, to waive certain “code of conduct” restrictions on utilities (gas and electric companies) which offer appliance and heating/cooling system repair and service in competition with non-utility service providers, if the utility controls less than 30 percent of the repair and servicing market in the area. Utilities would still be prohibited from inserting ads for the service in customer utility bills, or cross-subsidizing the service with regulated utility service revenues. Without this bill, recent Michigan Public Service Commission regulations could force utilities, specifically Consumers Energy, to stop offering this service.
Referred to the Senate Technology and Energy Committee on July 15, 2003.
Reported in the Senate on October 28, 2003, with the recommendation that the bill pass.
Referred to the House Energy and Technology Committee on October 30, 2003.
Reported in the House on March 25, 2004, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on March 25, 2004, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that narrows its scope to effectively apply solely to an appliance service program operated by Consumers Energy. See House-passed bill for details. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on March 25, 2004.
Passed 104 to 0 in the House on March 25, 2004, to waive certain “code of conduct” restrictions and allow an electric utility that offers an appliance service program in competition with non-utility service providers, if the utility maintains administrative separation between the program and the regulated utility functions of the company. The bill would require separate books and records for the program, and would prohibit inserting ads for the service in customer utility bills, or cross-subsidizing the service with regulated utility service revenues. It contains regulations on the operation of such a program. Without this bill, recent Michigan Public Service Commission regulations could force utilities, specifically Consumers Energy, to stop offering this service. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on March 30, 2004.
Passed 33 to 4 in the Senate on April 1, 2004, to concur with the House-passed version of the bill, which narrows its scope to effectively apply solely to an appliance service program operated by Consumers Energy. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on April 22, 2004.
1) whats next? by Anonymous Citizen on August 18, 2004 The next thing you know all of us in the HVAC Buisness will be working for Consumers or Michcon. Then there will be no competition.Hang on to your checkbook then! Reply
2) Sen. Garcia's "journal statement" by Admin003 on April 2, 2004 Senator Garcia asked and was granted unanimous consent to make a statement and moved that the statement be printed in the Journal.
The motion prevailed.
Senator Garcia's statement is as follows:
I want to thank the bill sponsor for concurring with what the House did. I think it is a much better bill than when it left the Senate. It does provide good service. What this bill does is allows good service to be provided to our constituents. I realize it does help employ some small business owners, but I have had some real difficulty with this bill because it pits, really, my senior citizens against many of my small business owners. Because of that, I have had some real struggles with this, but I will vote for this bill because my senior citizens and others tell me it is a good program it's a good bill. But I just feel compelled to say that I am afraid we have these issues that pit good, hardworking people like small business owners against senior citizens. It makes it difficult.
3) SB 612 by Anonymous Citizen on February 4, 2004 One recent frigid morning, while my husband and I were at work, my 18 year old daughter discovered our furnace was not working. Within 45 minutes MichCon had fixed it. One simple call and lots of security. Reply