Introduced by Sen. Shirley Johnson (R) on March 6, 2003, to provide a “template” or “place holder” for a Fiscal Year (FY) 2003-2004 Department of Career Development budget. This budget contains no appropriations, but these may be added later to make changes to current or future departmental appropriations.
Referred to the Senate Appropriations Committee on March 6, 2003.
Reported in the Senate on May 6, 2003, with the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on May 8, 2003, to replace the executive proposal for this budget, contained in Senate Bill 309, with a budget which expresses policy differences between the Republican-majority in the Senate and Governor Jennifer Granholm on certain spending items. See Senate-passed version for details. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on May 8, 2003.
Amendment offered by Sen. Martha G. Scott (D) on May 8, 2003, to remove a provision which would require the Focus:Hope organization to compete with other social service groups for funding in the future, rather than having its own line item in the budget. The amendment failed by voice vote in the Senate on May 8, 2003.
Amendment offered by Sen. Deborah Cherry (D) on May 8, 2003, to appropriate an additional $780,000 for "Michigan Volunteer Investment" grants, which subsidize non-profit social service organizations which use volunteers. The amendment failed 18 to 20 in the Senate on May 8, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Amendment offered by Sen. Mark Schauer (D) on May 8, 2003, to appropriate an additional $530,000 for "Michigan Volunteer Investment" grants, which subsidize non-profit social service organizations which use volunteers. The amendment failed 18 to 20 in the Senate on May 8, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Amendment offered by Sen. Ken Sikkema (R) on May 8, 2003, to appropriate an additional $2 million to the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) “job creation services” line item, and $2 million to the “economic development grants” line item, by removing $4 million from the MEDC administration line item, leaving it with $54,700. The amendment passed 22 to 16 in the Senate on May 8, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Amendment offered by Sen. Ken Sikkema (R) on May 8, 2003, to appropriate an additional $780,000 to the $3.15 million Focus: Hope organization grant by shifting funds from the Department of Career Development administration line item. The amendment passed 37 to 0 in the Senate on May 8, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Amendment offered by Sen. Michael Prusi (D) on May 8, 2003, to appropriate an additional $2 million to the Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) “job creation services” line item, and $2 million to the “economic development grants” line item. The amendment failed 16 to 22 in the Senate on May 8, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Passed 32 to 6 in the Senate on May 8, 2003, the Senate version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2003-2004 Department of Career Development and the Michigan Strategic Fund budgets. (Note: Gov. Jennifer Granholm’s proposed budget for this department is Senate Bill 309 .) This appropriates $566.4 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $605.9 million, which was the FY 2002-2003 amount enrolled in 2002, excluding any supplemental appropriations, line-item vetoes, or later cuts. Of this, $55.3 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2002-2003 amount enrolled in 2002 of $64.5 million. Among other changes, the budget reduces Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) funding by $4 million more than the $36 million cut the governor proposed. Much more information on Michigan’s budget is available at Hot Topics: Michigan’s Budget Challenge at www.mackinac.org/4964. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the House on May 8, 2003.
Referred to the House Appropriations Committee on May 8, 2003.
Reported in the House on June 12, 2003, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on June 17, 2003, to replace the Senate version of this budget with a House version which expresses policy differences between the bodies on certain spending items. See House-passed version for details. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on June 17, 2003.
Amendment offered by Rep. Jennifer Elkins (D) on June 17, 2003, to add $4 million to the MEDC administration line item. The Senate transferred this money to particular programs funded by the department, leaving administration with $54,700. The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on June 17, 2003.
Amendment offered by Rep. Michael Sak (D) on June 17, 2003, to insert a $100 “point of difference” between the House and Senate versions of the bill on funding for precollege programs in engineering and sciences. This opens these items up to negotiations between the bodies in an expected conference committee on the differences between the House- and Senate-passed versions of this budget. The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on June 17, 2003.
Amendment offered by Rep. Matthew Gillard (D) on June 17, 2003, to require that $25,000 of the tourism promotion money in this budget be spent promoting the northeast region of the state. The amendment failed 48 to 59 in the House on June 17, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Amendment offered by Rep. Steve Bieda (D) on June 17, 2003, to require the state Work First employment program to seek job placements which pay $8 per hour, rather than $6 per hour under current law. The amendment passed 61 to 47 in the House on June 17, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Amendment offered by Rep. Triette Reeves (D) on June 17, 2003, to appropriate an additional $2 million to the $3.86 million Focus: Hope organization grant, with the money coming from the job training programs line item. The amendment failed 50 to 59 in the House on June 17, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Amendment offered by Rep. Marsha Cheeks (D) on June 17, 2003, to strip out a provision prohibiting any Michigan Works! regional employment agency from receiving more than twice the funding per participant as any other regional agency. The provision was added following reports that Detroit's agency is granted three times more funding per participant as the lowest-funded agencies. The amendment failed 53 to 55 in the House on June 17, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Amendment offered by Rep. Marc Shulman (R) on June 17, 2003, to insert $10 million for a grant to create a life sciences research and commercialization center in the Kalamazoo area, intended to keep in the area 75 to 100 scientists and support staff formerly employed by the Pfizer/Pharmacia Corporation. This is in response to news that following the purchase by Pfizer of the Pharmacia Corporation, the company will close some drug research operations in the area. The $10 million will come from money that would have been used for a targeted tax credit that Pfizer will not receive, because current law makes the credit contingent on creating a certain number of new jobs. The amendment passed by voice vote in the House on June 17, 2003.
Amendment offered by Rep. Jack Minore (D) on June 17, 2003, to appropriate $100,000 for a Genesee County skill center to establish a precollege program in engineering and the sciences. The amendment failed by voice vote in the House on June 17, 2003.
Amendment offered by Rep. Jennifer Elkins (D) on June 17, 2003, to add $4 million to the MEDC administration line item. The Senate transferred this money to particular programs funded by the department, leaving administration with $54,700. The amendment failed 46 to 61 in the House on June 17, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Amendment offered by Rep. Marsha Cheeks (D) on June 17, 2003, to replace a provision prohibiting any Michigan Works! regional agency from receiving more than twice the funding per participant as any other regional agency with a requirement that the Department of Career Development should determine the formula for the allocation to regional agencies. The provision was added following reports that Detroit's agency is granted three times more funding per participant as the lowest-funded agencies. The amendment passed 58 to 50 in the House on June 17, 2003. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Passed 107 to 1 in the House on June 17, 2003, the House version of the Fiscal Year (FY) 2003-2004 Department of Career Development and the Michigan Strategic Fund budgets. (Note: Gov. Jennifer Granholm’s proposed budget for this department is Senate Bill 309 .) This appropriates $576.4 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $605.9 million, which was the FY 2002-2003 amount enrolled in 2002, excluding any supplemental appropriations, line-item vetoes, or later cuts. Of this, $65.3 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2002-2003 amount enrolled in 2002 of $64.5 million. Among other changes, the budget reduces Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) funding by $4 million more than $36 million cut the governor proposed. The House added $10 million for a grant to create a life sciences research and commercialization center in the Kalamazoo area, intended to keep in the area 75 to 100 scientists and support staff formerly employed by the Pfizer/Pharmacia Corporation. This is in response to news that following the purchase by Pfizer of the Pharmacia Corporation, the company will close some drug research operations in the area. The $10 million will come from money that would have been used for a targeted tax credit that Pfizer will not receive, because current law makes the credit contingent on creating a certain number of new jobs. Much more information on Michigan’s budget is available at Hot Topics: Michigan’s Budget Challenge at www.mackinac.org/4964. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on June 18, 2003.
Failed 0 to 38 in the Senate on June 18, 2003, to concur with a House-passed version of the bill. The vote sends the bill to a House-Senate conference committee to work out the differences. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the House on June 18, 2003.
Passed 104 to 3 in the House on July 17, 2003, the House-Senate conference report for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2003-2004 Department of Career Development and the Michigan Strategic Fund budgets. (Note: Gov. Jennifer Granholm’s proposed budget for this department is Senate Bill 309 .) This appropriates $571.2 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $605.9 million, which was the FY 2002-2003 amount enrolled in 2002, excluding any supplemental appropriations, line-item vetoes, or later cuts. Of this, $65.2 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2002-2003 amount enrolled in 2002 of $64.5 million. The Strategic Fund/ Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) share of this is $104.4 million gross, and $40.5 million from the General Fund, which is increased by $5 million above the amount originally recommended by the governor. The FY 2002-2003 amounts were $147.5 million gross and $38 million from the General Fund. Much more information on Michigan’s budget is available at Hot Topics: Michigan’s Budget Challenge at www.mackinac.org/4964. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Received in the Senate on June 24, 2003.
Passed 36 to 0 in the Senate on July 16, 2003, the House-Senate conference report for the Fiscal Year (FY) 2003-2004 Department of Career Development and the Michigan Strategic Fund budgets. (Note: Gov. Jennifer Granholm’s proposed budget for this department is Senate Bill 309 .) This appropriates $571.2 million in adjusted gross spending (funded from all sources, including special state restricted fund and federal pass-through dollars, minus interdepartmental transfers), compared to $605.9 million, which was the FY 2002-2003 amount enrolled in 2002, excluding any supplemental appropriations, line-item vetoes, or later cuts. Of this, $65.2 million will come from the General Fund (funded by actual state tax revenues), compared to the FY 2002-2003 amount enrolled in 2002 of $64.5 million. The Strategic Fund/ Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC) share of this is $104.4 million gross, and $40.5 million from the General Fund, which is increased by $5 million above the amount originally recommended by the governor. The FY 2002-2003 amounts were $147.5 million gross and $38 million from the General Fund. Much more information on Michigan’s budget is available at Hot Topics: Michigan’s Budget Challenge at www.mackinac.org/4964. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm on August 13, 2003.
1) White coat welfare. by Anonymous Citizen on June 18, 2003 This is objectionable. It is nothing more than white coat welfare, and a misuse of tax payer money. Reply
2) Sen. Leland's jounal comment by Admin003 on May 9, 2003 Senator Leland's statement is as follows:
I just want to let you know that although the previous speaker covered most of it, this institution has been around for 35 years, and as you know, it started after the riots in 1967. It has been a premiere civil rights institution that has done wonderful things that the previous speaker mentioned. This institution has been tracked and followed by every
United States President since it began back in 1968. Every President has walked through Focus: HOPE with defense money, contracts, and all kinds of other funding things to keep this institution alive and well. They would not have given this institution all of the things that they did had it not had a proven track record. I would hope that we would
restore the quarter of a million dollars that was taken out in the previous amendment. They do wonderful things. It is a great institution. They have a proven record, and again, lets' restore the quarter of a million dollars so they can continue on with their mission. Reply
3) Journal comments by Sen. Scott by Admin003 on May 9, 2003 Senator Scott's first statement is as follows:
I have this amendment because what it does is it says that Focus: HOPE cannot be funded next year. This is a training program that retrains people. It is an organization that started after the riots to help all people, no matter what race, nationality, or origin you are. Focus: HOPE is an outstanding program. They have had this program now for 35 years. The late Father Cunningham and Eleanor Josaitis had a vision, and we are going to tell people a year ahead of time that we are not going to fund you. I think that it's ludicrous to do this to such a great organization. I ask my colleagues
to support this amendment.
Senator Scott's second statement is as follows:
As I said in committee, if you have them on notice, you have said this to them verbally. In fact, the heads of that organization were at the meeting. However, were not allowed to speak at that particular meeting. So if you have them
on notice, why do we have to put this in the budget? I dont think this is necessary.
Senator Scotts third statement is as follows:
What this amendment does is restores $250,000 to Focus: HOPE. Let me tell you about Focus Hope. I would like to have both my colleagues on both sides of the aisle"I'd love to have your attention on this. This is a very important
issue and I am very proud to have Focus Hope in my district. Let me just read to you their mission statement. This organization started 35 years ago and their mission statement says Recognizing the dignity and beauty of every
person, we pledge intelligent and practical action to overcome racism, poverty and injustice. And to build a metropolitan community where all people may live in freedom, harmony, trust and affection. Black and white, yellow, brown and red from Detroit and its suburbs of every economic status, national origin and religious persuasion we join
in his convent, and this was adopted March 8, 1968. They also say, together, we will make his work live on. That was regarding Father Cunningham who had the vision along with Ms. Josaitis. While the nation was divided over civil rights, courageous people stood up for what was right. Father Cunningham, Eleanor Josaitis, and a small band of determined people started a movement. They pledged, as I stated intelligence, practical action to fight for racism, poverty, and justice, and Focus Hope was born. They started a food program that gives infants a nutritious start in life and helps build Senior Citizen survival. Each month more than 43,000 mothers, children under the age of 6, and senior citizens living on a meager income that gets help through Focus Hope, the supplemental program that they have. They established an education and training program that gives people access to the financial main stream. More that 3,000 individuals have graduated from Focus Hope center of opportunity obtaining jobs in manufacturing, engineering, and information technology fields. Its' foisted understanding of different cultures through community arts programs, through exhibits, music, dance, photography, more than 11,000 people have gained new insight on different cultures. There is so much that Focus Hopes does. We need to reinstate the dollars. I wish we could reinstate the whole $4 million, because it is certainly needed. They have the greatest training programs. They allow people to have marketable skills, providing use and other job skills. These job skills are in demand. These programs have, especially been proven
successful in providing opportunities for minorities and economically disadvantaged individuals to move from poverty to the economic mainstream. Since first opening its Machinist Training Institute in 1981, the programs have been industry focused and developed in partnership with many of the corporations. Today, the programs have evolved to include the Center for Advanced Technologies where students can earn degrees through Michigan universities in manufacturing engineering and technology, the Information Technologies Centers offering industries certificates, and a pioneering High School program accelerating career development options through dual enrollment. Another key element is the availability of the FAST TRACK program. The FAST TRACK program was started back in the late "80s, when I was Mayor of Highland Park. We were the past through for the FAST TRACK
program. It helped so many young people. There is a First Step program for many entering students. These provide a model for Michigan's FAST TRACK and their Step Up Program. Throughout the history of training and education programs at Focus Hope, the stare of Michigan has been and indispensable partner. Since 1997, the state of Michigan
funding has leveraged other sources of support. The CAT alone has drawn a federal investment in Michigan of over $150 million.
So, I ask my colleagues to support this amendment, it is so vitally needed. They have outstanding people on their advisory board. Let me just say the manufacturing is an important and enduring component in Michigans economy. There are close to 1 million "978 thousand workers employed in manufacturing. This is 21 percent of all employment in the state.
Looking to the future, manufacturing industries are projected to generate more than 200 thousand jobs over the next decade in order to replace workers retiring from the manufacturing labor force. An analysis of the skilled production occupations suggests that labor supply is lagging demand. The largest
supply/demand gap appears in the high growth machinist and related occupations. This is divesting that machinist
programs that we need so dearly in this stateI am sure that we all want to lift people up to change their status from poverty to having a good productive life. I am sure we all want that for everyone. So, I ask you to please vote for this amendment. This is a great amendment. Reply