Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2003 House Bill 5335: Tax breaks for "start-up business"

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Rep. Accavitti's "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on April 29, 2004 
Rep. Accavitti, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on the companion package of bills to HB 5331 which were deemed to assist 'start-up' businesses (HB 5335, 5341-43, 5345; SB 863, 865, 867, 872, 875) because they will actually amount to very little in terms of tax relief to business but will cost the state treasury up to $15 million at a time when, if revenues are not increased, significant reductions will have to take place in programs to seniors, education and health care.

The bills also have the potential of undermining existing economic development programs and incentives and pitting local units against each other in the race to land businesses. Local units will again be forced to choose."

Reply

Line

2) Rep. Jamnick's "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on April 29, 2004 
Rep. Jamnick, having reserved the right to explain her protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on this package of bills (SB 863, 865, 867, 872, 875 and HB 5335, 5341, 5342, 5343, 5345) because they have the potential to continue to reduce revenues in the School Aid Fund as well as State and local governments. It also creates another opportunity where our communities will be competing against one another for business locations."

Reply

Line

3) Rep. Meisner's "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on April 29, 2004 
Rep. Meisner, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

Supporting small businesses in their infancy is an important goal. However, piling more and more tax exemptions onto the $27 billion in tax expenditures that the state of Michigan gave away last year is a mistake. Prior to adding new tax breaks to the tax code, which already has more holes than Swiss cheese, we should undertake a comprehensive review of the tax breaks we've already given to see if they've lived up to their billing. If they haven't, they should be repealed and replaced. This legislative package is putting the cart before the horse."

Reply

Line


View Full Conversation