Introduced by Rep. James Koetje (R) on June 19, 2003, to prohibit the Department of Natural Resources from banning the carrying of handguns on state land by those who have a concealed pistol license (CPL), or are otherwise authorized to carry. A person would still need a hunting license to take game.
Referred to the House Conservation and Outdoor Recreation Committee on June 19, 2003.
Reported in the House on December 10, 2003, with the recommendation that the substitute (H-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the House on December 16, 2003, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described. The substitute passed by voice vote in the House on December 16, 2003.
Referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee on December 17, 2003.
Reported in the Senate on May 5, 2004, with the recommendation that the substitute (S-2) be adopted and that the bill then pass.
Substitute offered in the Senate on May 6, 2004, to replace the previous version of the bill with one that revises details but does not change the substance of the bill as previously described. The substitute passed by voice vote in the Senate on May 6, 2004.
Passed 34 to 4 in the Senate on May 11, 2004, to prohibit the Department of Natural Resources from banning the carrying of handguns on state land by those who have a concealed pistol license (CPL), or are otherwise authorized to carry. A person would still need a hunting license to take game. Who Voted "Yes" and Who Voted "No"
1) Great Job! by dfreund on May 13, 2004 Thank you Michigan Legislature for a good common sense approach and passing of this Bill.
Dave Reply
2) Bout time by Anonymous Citizen on May 6, 2004 NJow we need to disban the DNR since they seem to have way too much power but no common sense on how it should be used. Personally I would rather see a conservation officer then a cop. Then maybe we would be back on track with the dnr, return them to what they were not as they are now. They use all kinda of tatics to drum up money in cluding tresspassing on private land, flying too low and well pertty much since it was changed to what they are now no longer seem to care about the land or the animals. Letting Deer starve to "stop Deer TB" is all a farse it isn't true and in fact Deer do not get it in the wild only when they are in close contact of the beef do they. Get it right DNR or close Reply
3) Worried about the wrong people by Anonymous Citizen on May 5, 2004 Reps. Vagnozzi and Tobocman gave the following as the reasons as for their "No". vote.
"Our state parks should be a place where people can go with their friends, family and children to relax and be free from worry. Our citizens should not have to worry whether or not the person next to them has a loaded gun in their picnic basket."
Do they really feel that licensed law abiding citizens are the threat they should be worrying about? How many rapes, assaults, etc. are committed in state parks etc.by them? What makes a State Park be safer than any other area? Reply