Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2003 House Bill 4817: Revise mortgage discharge procedures

Public Act 447 of 2004

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Mortgage bill not extreme  by Anonymous on June 13, 2003 
One may disagree with the bill, but it is not extreme. 90 days made sense when transportation and communications were much slower. Recording a discharge is a routine action and there is no reason to take 90 days. Might 14 or 21 days be better? Maybe, and the legislative process will sort that out, if the bill moves at all.
Reply

Line

2) Extreme!  by Anonymous Citizen on June 13, 2003 
What could possibly motivate someone to offer such extreme legislation. Any move from 90 down to 7, and from 100 up to 1000 is EXTREME! How can individuals and/or institutions accomodate such radical changes? And, more importantly, is it fair to expect this? This bill looks like a way to set up the mortgagee in order to be assured of bilking the mortagee of $1000.
Reply

Line

3) 2003 House Bill 4817 (Revise mortgage discharge procedures)  by admin on January 1, 2001 
Introduced in the House on June 10, 2003, to reduce from 90 days to 60 days the time a mortgagee (the mortgage holder, including banks, mortgage companies, etc.) has to file a discharge of mortgage with the register of deeds. The bill would also increase from $100 to $1,000 the amount a mortgagee who fails to file a discharge within that time may be required to pay the borrower. Under current law, and under the bill, a mortgagee may also be required to pay to the borrower all other actual damages caused by the failure to provide a discharge as required

The vote was 103 in favor, 0 opposed and 6 not voting

(House Roll Call 689 at House Journal 65)

Click here to view bill details.
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation