2003 House Bill 4557 / Public Act 52

Introduced in the House

April 10, 2003

Introduced by Rep. Barbara Farrah (D-13)

To collect more income tax from non-residents, by expanding the types of income earned by non-residents which are considered "business income," and are therefore subject to Michigan's income tax. This bill is one of many authorizing “revenue enhancements” which Gov. Jennifer Granholm has proposed to close a gap between state spending and expected revenue in the Fiscal Year 2003-2004 budget. The Senate Fiscal Agency estimates the bill would increase income tax collected from taxpayers by some $6 million in FY 2003-04.

Referred to the Committee on Tax Policy

April 30, 2003

Reported without amendment

Without amendment and with the recommendation that the bill pass.

May 1, 2003

Amendment offered by Rep. James Koetje (R-86)

To limit the authority of the Department of Treasury to expand the definition of taxable business income earned in Michigan by out-of-state firms. Instead, expansions of the definition beyond those specified in the bill would require legislative approval.

The amendment passed 57 to 47 (details)

Amendment offered by Rep. Shelley Goodman Taub (R-40)

To require the Department of Treasury to report to the legislature in two years on the impact of the bill on the tax liability of resident and nonresident taxpayers.

The amendment passed by voice vote

Passed in the House 71 to 34 (details)

Received in the Senate

May 6, 2003

Referred to the Committee on Finance

June 3, 2003

Reported without amendment

With the recommendation that the substitute (S-1) be adopted and that the bill then pass.

June 4, 2003

Substitute offered

To replace the previous version of the bill with one which incorporates technical changes that do not affect the substance of the bill as previously described.

The substitute passed by voice vote

June 5, 2003

Passed in the Senate 34 to 4 (details)

To collect more income tax from non-residents, by expanding the types of income earned by non-residents which are considered "business income," and are therefore subject to Michigan's income tax. This bill is one of many authorizing “revenue enhancements” which Gov. Jennifer Granholm has proposed to close a gap between state spending and expected revenue in the Fiscal Year 2003-2004 budget. The Senate Fiscal Agency estimates the bill would increase income tax collected from taxpayers by some $6 million in FY 2003-04.

Received in the House

June 24, 2003

Amendment offered by Rep. Barbara Farrah (D-13)

To specify that the intention of the bill is only to clarify the definition and scope of business income as originally intended by the legislature, not expand it.

The amendment failed by voice vote

Passed in the House 86 to 20 (details)

To concur with the Senate-passed version of the bill.

Signed by Gov. Jennifer Granholm

July 11, 2003