Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2003 House Bill 4392

Public Act 159 of 2003

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Rep. Bieda's "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on April 11, 2003 
Rep. Bieda, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following statement:
"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
It is with deep disappointment at the fiscal irresponsibility of this legislative body that I feel compelled to vote
against this bill. We are Constitutionally required to pass a balanced budget. This bill contains a $60 million dollar hole with no provisions for funding. Our constituents demand fiscal accountability. We cannot engage in ENRON style accounting practices, merrily spending money we do not have, that does not exist elsewhere, and with no serious plans,
proposals or even ideas from where to draw this money. When a boat is taking on water, you don't drill more holes in it. This bill relies on phantom dollars, and seriously jeopardizes health care in this state by continuing a structural deficit that has resulted in a nearly $2 billion shortfall. Purposely writing a check that bounces is a crime in this state.
Here, this legislature is essentially doing the same thing. We owe it to our communities to honestly address the budget mess. HB 4392 as passed by the House is a seriously flawed and perhaps devious attempt to undermine and destroy
health care programs that our citizens rely and depend on. Understanding that this is but a first step in the budget
process, I hope that this legislature gets its act together and can pass a balanced budget that honestly addresses the
concerns of the people of this state. I trust that we will."
Reply

Line

2) Rep. Condino's "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on April 11, 2003 
Rep. Condino, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following
statement:
"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
I voted no on HB4392 as this bill creates a $60 million dollar budget "hole" that would "gut" funding to those most served by medical and health care services in our state. It would violate my oath of office to support a budget bill which
creates an unbalanced budget while putting our seniors and indigents at risk of further losing the health care services they are most in need of. I am very supportive of negotiating ways of preserving merit scholarship funding, but not
jeopardizing health care to the poor and disabled."
Reply

Line

3) Rep. Meisner's "no vote explanation"  by Admin003 on April 11, 2003 
Rep. Meisner, having reserved the right to explain his protest against the passage of the bill, made the following
statement:
"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:
It is with some regret that I cast a no vote on HB 4392, a bill to provide funding for the State of Michigan's Department of Community Health. This is the department responsible for many of state government's most important functions, including the Elder Prescription Drug Insurance Coverage Program, the provision of healthcare services for children and senior citizens, and essential programs to provide mental health and substance abuse treatment services for the most vulnerable among us. The basis for my regret is that despite the great value of items in this budget, including a well-deserved increase in funding for innovative drug treatment courts, my colleagues on the other side of the aisle have put these programs into severe jeopardy by suggesting that we continue down the path of fiscal irresponsibility
that has put our state's budget into the mess we face today. My Republican colleagues would have us pass a bill that is $60 million out of balance. This in response to the proposal put forth by Governor Granholm, which balances our
budget and puts us—for the first time in twelve years—on the path towards good fiscal health and responsible fiscal stewardship. Once again I must call on the wisdom of my colleagues in the Senate to fix the mess created by the House.
The people of Michigan deserve better than this."
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation