Legislation watch
Mackinac Center for Public Policy
Capitol Building

2002 Senate Bill 1165

Public Act 244 of 2002

facebook  twitter    Comments on this legislation    Post new comment    Text and Analysis    Add to Watch List 
  Previous   Next 

Most Recent Comments

1) Rep. Woodward's "no vote explanation"  by Admin002 on March 28, 2002 
"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on Senate Bills 1165 and 1166 because they are a short-sighted attempt to balance the state's budget on our future. This kind of economics is not good for an individual, and it is not good for Michigan. I have always supported the highest funding for our public schools possible, but this is a short-time fix that is going to result in a long-term shortage in the School Aid Fund. There are other ways to fulfill the upcoming Education's budget than balancing it on the backs of students in the future. I strongly believe in increasing the minimum foundation per pupil allowance to $6,700, and there are many other alternatives we could have employed to make this happen. Poor management of our state dollars has helped create this problem, a long-term strategy needs to be implemented to fully fund our state priorities- namely education. Worst yet, is that working families and seniors that live in Royal Oak, Madison Heights, and Hazel Park on limited and fixed incomes are going to pay more taxes in a shorter amount of time. When many people I represent are living month-to-month and struggling to make current ends meet, this bill speeds up the time that you have to pay their school taxes. This has the initial effect of a tax increase on those who are least able to afford it. What are those who are struggling to afford food, prescription drugs, and other needs going to have to give up in order to pay their taxes six months early?In the end, this bill eliminates $250 million in future School Aid Funding, and creates a potential $500 million deficit in the 2003-04 school budget. The people of Michigan deserve more than a temporary quick fix for a long-term problem."
Reply

Line

2) No Vote Explanation  by Admin002 on March 28, 2002 
Reps. Waters and Dennis made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on Senate Bills 1165 and 1166 because I believe it is a temporary solution to a long-term problem. Although this bill provides an ingenious fix to raise K-12 education foundation grants to $6700 per pupil, it mortgages our future to pay for today's budget crisis. In fiscal year 2003-04, this change will create a deficit in the School Aid budget of almost $500 million. In addition, by cutting the State Education Tax rate from 6 mills to 5, this bill eliminates over $250 million in School Aid funding. This is Enron style fiscal irresponsibility, particularly in today's tenuous economic situation. Rather than continuing to rely on short-term fixes, Michigan needs to correct its structural budget flaws so that we can fully fund priorities such as education."
Reply

Line

3) No Vote Explanation  by Admin002 on March 28, 2002 
Reps. Reeves, Hardman, Garza, Clark, Bogardus and Dennis made the following statement:

"Mr. Speaker and members of the House:

I voted no on Senate Bills 1165 and 1166 because I believe it is a temporary solution to a long-term problem. Although this bill provides a creative fix to raise K-12 education foundation grants to $6700 per pupil, it mortgages our future to pay for today's budget crisis. In fiscal year 2003-04, this change will create a deficit in the School Aid budget of almost $500 million. In addition, by cutting the State Education Tax rate from 6 mills to 5, this bill eliminates over $250 million in School Aid funding. This is Enron style fiscal irresponsibility, particularly in today's tenuous economic situation. Rather than continuing to rely on short-term fixes, Michigan needs to correct its structural budget flaws so that we can fully fund priorities such as education."
Reply

Line


View Full Conversation