Introduced by Rep. Mark Schauer (D) on July 2, 2002, to prohibit the use by a company engaged in commerce of any unfair, unconscionable, or deceptive method, act, or practice, unless it is a transaction or conduct specifically authorized or expressly permitted by state or federal laws and regulations. The burden of proof would be on the accused to demonstrate that an action was permitted by law.
Referred to the House Commerce Committee on July 2, 2002.
1) What is HB 6236 Consumer Protection Act by Anonymous Citizen on July 22, 2002 Dear Gentlemen,
I recently learned that the courts have considerably weakened the Consumer Protection Act - Fraudulent and deceptive business practices.
This reinventing the wheel when good laws the Michigan legislature enacts become watered down to benifit the violators is insulting to the residents of the state. Currently attorney's totally exempt if they advertise falsely their skills and previous experience or falsely report what they did or did not do for a client. Usually these violators charge the clients thousands of dollars so their falsehoods are very profitable. The Attorney Grievance Commission refuses to discipline 'their legal brothers' regardless of the extent of the misconduct. The failure of the Michigan legislature to be effectivie leaders against outrageous professional misconduct is something that should no longer be ignored. Kindly effect legistlation that makes false advertising and business practices applicable against all businesses in the state. Reply
2) 2002 House Bill 6236 by admin on January 1, 2001 Introduced in the House on July 2, 2002